Van Horn v. Acctcorp of Southern Nevada et al

Filing 38

ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation for Extension re 23 RENEWED MOTION to Dismiss. Replies due by 2/29/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/15/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GARY E. SCHNITZER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 395 MATTHEW A. WALKER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13275 KRAVITZ,SCHNITZER& JOHNSON,CHTD. 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 T. (702) 362-6666 F. (702) 362-2203 gschnitzer@ksjattorneys.com mwalker@ksjattorneys.com Attorneys for Defendant, FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 KERRI L. VAN HORN, 13 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 (702) 362-66666 KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD. 10 14 15 16 17 18 Case No. 2:15-cv-02345-RFB-CWH Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY, LLC ACCTCORP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., CAPITAL TO FILE ITS REPLY IN ONE, FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, SUPPORT OF ITS RENEWED LLC, CITIBANK, and EXPERIAN MOTION TO DISMISS INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., (FIRST REQUEST) vs. Defendants. 19 20 COMES NOW, Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC (“Defendant”), and 21 Plaintiff Kerri L. Van Horn (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel, and hereby 22 submit this Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC 23 to File Its Reply In Support Of Its Renewed Motion to Dismiss. 24 WHEREAS, this case was removed to this Court on December 9, 2015 (Dkt. #1); 25 WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss on December 21, 2015 (Dkt. #14); 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint January 7, 2016 (Dkt. #19); WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Renewed Motion to Dismiss on January 20, 2016 (Dkt. 1 1 #23); 2 3 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss on February 5, 2016 (Dkt. #35); 4 WHEREAS, Defendant’s current deadline to reply is February 15, 2015; 5 WHEREAS, the Parties have stipulated that Defendant shall have up to and including 6 7 February 29, 2016, to file its reply; WHEREAS, Defendant is in the process of obtaining the proper documents in order to 9 address specific issues and arguments raised in Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and Opposition 10 to Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss. The facts contained in those documents will inform 11 Defendant which legal arguments it may appropriately raise in its reply; 12 WHEREAS, this is Defendant’s first request for an extension of this deadline. 13 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 (702) 362-66666 KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD. 8 THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS HEREBY 14 15 STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties as follows: 16 (1) The current deadline, of February 15, 2016, to reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s 17 Motion to Dismiss is hereby vacated; 18 19 /// 20 21 22 /// 23 24 /// 25 26 /// 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 (2) Defendant shall have up to and including February 29, 2016, to file its Reply In Support Of Its Renewed Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED this 12th day of February, 2016. 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Michael Kind Michael Kind Nevada Bar No. KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP 7854 W. Sahara Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ Matthew A. Walker Gary E. Schnitzer, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 395 Matthew A. Walker Nevada Bar No. 13275 KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD. 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, NV 89123 Attorneys for Defendant 11 12 13 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 (702) 362-66666 KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD. 10 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 15th day of February, 2016. 15 16 __________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?