Van Horn v. Acctcorp of Southern Nevada et al

Filing 42

ORDER Granting 41 Stipulation re 23 RENEWED MOTION to Dismiss. Replies due by 3/14/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-02345-RFB-CWH Document 41 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GARY E. SCHNITZER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 395 MATTHEW A. WALKER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13275 KRAVITZ,SCHNITZER & JOHNSON,CHTD. 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 T. (702) 362-6666 F. (702) 362-2203 gschnitzer@ksjattorneys.com mwalker@ksjattorneys.com Attorneys for Defendant, FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 KERRI L. VAN HORN, 13 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 (702) 362-66666 KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD. 10 14 15 16 17 18 Case No. 2:15-cv-02345-RFB-CWH Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR CREDIT ACCTCORP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., CAPITAL COMPANY, LLC, TO FILE ITS ONE, FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS LLC, CITIBANK, and EXPERIAN RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., vs. Defendants. (SECOND REQUEST) 19 20 COMES NOW, Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC (“Defendant”), and 21 Plaintiff Kerri L. Van Horn (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel, and hereby 22 submit this Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC 23 to File Its Reply In Support Of Its Renewed Motion to Dismiss. 24 25 WHEREAS, this case was removed to this Court on December 9, 2015 (Dkt. #1); 26 WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss on December 21, 2015 (Dkt. #14); 27 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint January 7, 2016 (Dkt. #19); 28 1 Case 2:15-cv-02345-RFB-CWH Document 41 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Renewed Motion to Dismiss on January 20, 2016 (Dkt. 1 2 #23); 3 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss on February 5, 2016 (Dkt. #35); 5 WHEREAS, Defendant’s current deadline to reply is February 29, 2016; 6 WHEREAS, the Parties have stipulated that Defendant shall have up to and including 7 8 March 14, 2016, to file its reply; WHEREAS, Defendant requires more time to obtain the proper documents in 10 order to address specific issues and arguments raised in Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and 11 Opposition to Defendant’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss. The facts contained in those documents 12 will inform Defendant which legal arguments it may appropriately raise in its reply; 13 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 (702) 362-66666 KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD. 9 WHEREAS, this is Defendant’s second request for an extension of this deadline. 14 THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS HEREBY 15 16 STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties as follows: 17 (1) The current deadline, of February 29, 2016, to reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s 18 Motion to Dismiss is hereby vacated; 19 20 /// 21 22 23 /// 24 25 /// 26 27 /// 28 2 Case 2:15-cv-02345-RFB-CWH Document 41 Filed 02/26/16 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 (2) Defendant shall have up to and including March 14, 2016, to file its Reply In Support Of Its Renewed Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Michael Kind Michael Kind Nevada Bar No. KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP 7854 W. Sahara Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ Matthew A. Walker Gary E. Schnitzer, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 395 Matthew A. Walker Nevada Bar No. 13275 KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD. 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, NV 89123 Attorneys for Defendant 11 12 13 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 (702) 362-66666 KRAVITZ, SCHNITZER & JOHNSON, CHTD. 10 DATED this 26th day of February, 2016. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 29, 2016February, 2016. DATED this day of 16 17 United States District Judge Judge United States Magistrate 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?