Suzanne L. Walsh v. Bank of America N.A., et al

Filing 11

ORDER Granting 9 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint. Capital Ones time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint is herebyextended. Capital One shall file its responsive pleading to the Complaint on or before 1/15/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA – LAS VEGAS 10 11 SUZANNE L. WALSH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., CAPITAL ONE BANK USA, N.A., SPECIALIZED 15 LOAN SERVICING, LLC, and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 16 LLC, 17 18 19 Defendant. Case No. 2:15-cv-02353-GMN-GWF Assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro Referred to Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Stipulation filed concurrently herewith] Complaint Filed: August 6, 2015 Trial Date: TBA 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ORDER 1 2 The Court has reviewed the Stipulation filed by Plaintiff Suzanne L. Walsh and 3 Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (“Capital One”), to extend Capital One’s 4 time to file a responsive pleading by thirty (30) days. The Stipulation is incorporated 5 herein by reference. Good cause appearing thereon, the Court hereby orders as 6 follows: 7 Capital One’s time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint is hereby 8 extended. Capital One shall file its responsive pleading to the Complaint on or before 9 January 15, 2016. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 December 17, 2015 13 DATED: ____________________ __________________________ 14 GEORGE FOLEY, JR. HON. GLORIA M. NAVARRO United States Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?