Walsh v. Capital One et al

Filing 32

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Roundpoint Mortgage's 31 Notice of Disassociation and Withdrawal of Counsel is Granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall remove Christopher S. Connell, Esq. from the CM/ECF service list in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 02/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 SUZANNE L. WALSH, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) vs. ) ) CAPITAL ONE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:15-cv-02354-GMN-GWF ORDER 13 14 15 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Roundpoint Mortgage’s Notice of Disassociation and Wtihdrawal of Counsel (ECF No. 31), filed on February 24, 2017. Counsel for Defendant represents that Christopher S. Connell, Esq. is no longer associated with 17 the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP. Therefore, counsel requests that Mr. Connell be removed 18 as attorney of record for Defendant. Counsel also indicates that Mr. Connell’s withdrawal will not 19 delay or prejudice the proceedings in this matter because Defendant will continue to be represented by 20 attorney Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq. of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP. The Court finds that counsel has 21 provided good cause to justify granting Mr. Connell’s withdrawal. Accordingly, 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Roundpoint Mortgage’s Notice of Disassociation and Withdrawal of Counsel (ECF No. 31) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall remove Christopher S. Connell, Esq. from the CM/ECF service list in this case. DATED this 27th day of February, 2017. 27 28 ______________________________________ _______________________________ __ _ _ ___ _ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. GEORGE FOLEY, OR OR O United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?