Riekki v. Bank of America et al

Filing 34

ORDER Denying 32 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/24/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
MONA G. RIEKKI,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
vs.
10
BANK OF AMERICA, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:15-cv-02370-GMN-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 32)

13

Pending before the Court is a discovery plan. Docket No. 32. The Court has already entered a

14

scheduling order, Docket No. 30, and that scheduling order governs the progress of this case. Moreover,

15

it is not readily apparent how the recently-filed discovery plan differs from the schedule already in place.

16

To the extent the parties seek an extension of any deadline(s) in the operative scheduling order, they

17

must file a proper request for an extension. See, e.g., Local Rule 26-4. Accordingly, the discovery plan

18

at Docket No. 32 is DENIED.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

DATED: March 24, 2016

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge