Bartech Systems International, Inc. v. Mobile Simple Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 257

ORDER dismissing all counts in Defendant Mobile Canada's ECF No. 13 Counterclaims; directing that Default Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Bartech, and against Defendant Mobile Canaca, on all counts in Bartech's ECF No. [ 1]-32 First Amended Complaint; directing that said Default Judgment be in an amount and for such other relief that the Court determines upon application of Plaintiff Bartech. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/29/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Michael R. Kealy,
Nevada Bar No. 971
Ashley C. Nikkel,
Nevada Bar No. 12838
PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER
50 W. Liberty Street, Suite 750
Reno, Nevada 89501
Telephone:[phone]
Facsimile:[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
— and —
Gregory T. Lawrence, Esq.
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Kyle S. Kushner, Esq.
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
CONTI FENN & LAWRENCE LLC
36 S. Charles Street, Suite 2501
Baltimore, Maryland 21201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
BARTECH SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL,INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
BARTECH SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL,
INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff/Counter-defendant,
vs.

MOBILE SIMPLE SOLUTIONS, INC., a
Delaware corporation, MOBILE SIMPLE
SOLUTIONS (IAS), INC., a Canadian
TESSIER, an
VINCENT
corporation,
individual, CHRISTELLE PIGEAT, an
individual,
Defendants/Counterclaimants.

PARSONS
BEHLE &
LATIMER

Case No. 2:15-cv-02422-MMD-NJK
[PROPOSED] ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Order dated September 29, 2016 directing Defendant
and Counterclaimant Mobile Simple Solutions (IAS), Inc.("Defendant Mobile Canada") to retain
counsel by October 31, 2016 (ECF No. 149), the Clerk's entry of default of Defendant Mobile
Canada as to its counterclaims (ECF No. 187), the Clerk's entry of default of Defendant Mobile
Canada as to claims raised in the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
Bartech Systems International, Inc. ("Plaintiff Bartech") (ECF No. 205), and the Order dated
January 26, 2017 directing Defendant Mobile Canada to show cause in writing, no later than
February 8, 2017, why default judgment should not be entered for its failure to comply with the
Court's order to retain counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that all counts in Defendant Mobile
Canada's Counterclaims(ECF No. 13) are DISMISSED; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Default Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff
Bartech, and against Defendant Mobile Canada, on all counts in Bartech's First Amended
Complaint(ECF No. 1-32); and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that said Default Judgment shall be in an amount and for
such other relief that the Court determines upon application of Plaintiff Bartech.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:

March 29, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PARSONS
BEHLE &
LATIMER

2