Bartech Systems International, Inc. v. Mobile Simple Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 475

ORDER granting 474 Stipulation to continue Motion hearing. The hearing set for April 19, 2018 at 1:30 PM in Reno Courtroom 5 before Judge Miranda M. Du is vacated. The matter will be reset by the Courtroom Administrator. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PAV)

Download PDF
1 6 Michael V. Infuso, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 7388 Keith W. Barlow, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12689 Sean B. Kirby, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 14224 GREENE INFUSO, LLP 3030 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 Telephone: (702) 570-6000 Facsimile: (702) 463-8401 E-mail: minfuso @greeneinfusolaw.com kbarlow@greeneinfusolaw.com skirby@greeneinfusolaw.com 7 Attorneys for Defendant GEM SA 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 BARTECH SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC., Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 V MOBILE SIMPLE SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, MOBILE SIMPLE SOLUTIONS (IAS), INC., a Canadian corporation, GEM SA, a Belgian corporation, VINCENT TESSIER, an individual, CHRISTELLE PIGEAT, an individual, Defendants 18 19 ____________________________________ 21 MOBILE SIMPLE SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, VINCENT TESSIER, an individual, CHRISTELLE PIGEAT, an individual, 22 Counterclaimants, 20 23 24 Case No. 2:15-cv-02422-MMD-NJK vs. 25 BARTECH SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC., a Delaware corporation, 26 Counter-defendant. 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT GEM SA’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO LIFT/DISSOLVE AND/OR RECONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (First Request) 1 Pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules IA 6-1, 2 Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Bartech Systems International, Inc. (“Bartech”) and Defendant and 3 Counterclaimant GEM SA (“GEM”), by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree to a 4 continuance of the hearing on GEM’s Emergency Motion to Lift/Dissolve and/or Reconsider the 5 Preliminary Injunction (“Motion to Lift”) currently scheduled for April 19, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. 6 (“Hearing”). This is the first request for a continuation of the Hearing. GEM and Bartech hereby 7 stipulate and agree to the following: 8 WHEREAS, this Court set a Hearing on the Motion to Lift for April 19, 2018; 9 WHEREAS, Defendant GEM’s counsel represents that unexpected issues arose on April 10 17, 2018, at a trial on an unrelated matter in which Defendant GEM’s counsel is involved, 11 thereby rendering GEM’s counsel unable to attend the Hearing; WHEREAS, GEM and Bartech jointly agree to a continuation of the Hearing; 12 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 2 1 DATED this 18th day of April, 2018. DATED this 18th day of April, 2018. 2 GREENE INFUSO, LLP PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER 7 /s/ Keith W. Barlow Michael V. Infuso, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7388 Keith W. Barlow, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12689 3030 South Jones Boulevard, Suite 101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 8 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant /s/ Michael R. Kealy (Signed by filing attorney with permission of counsel) Michael R. Kealy, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 971 Ashley C. Nikkel, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12838 50 W. Liberty Street, Suite 750 Las Vegas, Nevada 89501 3 4 5 6 9 – and – 10 CONTI FENN & LAWRENCE LLC 11 Gregory T. Lawrence, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Kyle S. Kushner, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 36 S. Charles Street, Suite 2501 Baltimore, Maryland 21201 12 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant 15 16 17 18 The hearing set for April 19, 2018 at 1:30 PM is vacated. The matter will be reset by the Courtroom Administrator. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 21 _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 April 18, 2018 DATED: ______________________________ 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?