Bartech Systems International, Inc. v. Mobile Simple Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 488

ORDER granting ECF No. 486 Defendant Tessier's motion to extend time to file a pretrial order. A pretrial order shall be filed no later than 8/14/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 BARTECH SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., 11 12 13 Case No.: 2:15-cv-2422-MMD-NJK Plaintiff(s), Order v. MOBILE SIMPLE SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., 14 (Docket No. 486) Defendant 15 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant Vincent Tessier’s motion to extend time to file a 17 pretrial order. Docket No. 486. On June 11, 2018, Plaintiff and Defendant GEM SA filed their 18 joint pretrial order, which did not include a statement from Defendant Tessier. Docket No. 485. 19 In the instant motion, Defendant Tessier asks the Court for a 60-day extension to file his pretrial 20 order. Docket No. 486. Defendant Tessier submits the following reasons establish good cause for 21 the extension: (1) he is pro se; (2) the automatic stay due to his bankruptcy was lifted in April 22 2018; (3) he works full-time and, therefore, has limited time to review the necessary documents; 23 (4) Plaintiff does not object to the extension; and (5) the extension will not delay proceedings, as 24 the proposed dates for trial are in early 2019. Id. at 2; see also Docket No. 485 at 36. 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 1 1 For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Defendant Tessier’s motion to extend time to 2 file a pretrial order. Docket No. 486. A pretrial order shall be filed no later than August 14, 2018. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: June 15, 2018 5 _______________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?