AJ Sloan, Inc. et al v. Holloway et al

Filing 50

ORDER that 49 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. FURTHER ORDERED that 41 Motion for Attorney's Fees and Non-Taxable Costs is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 AJ SLOAN, INC., et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4 5 6 Plaintiffs, vs. JACQUELINE R. HOLLOWAY, et al., 7 Defendants. 8 Case No.: 2:15-cv-02436-GMN-VCF ORDER 9 10 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable United 11 States Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach, (ECF No. 49), which recommends that Jacqueline 12 Holloway and Clark County’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Attorney’s Fees and 13 Non-Taxable Costs, (ECF No. 41), be denied. 14 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 15 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 16 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 17 determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, 18 or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is 20 not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an 21 objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized 22 that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 23 where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 24 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). 25 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. Accordingly, Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 49), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees and NonTaxable Costs, (ECF No. 41), is DENIED. 5 6 13 DATED this ___day of February, 2018. 7 8 9 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?