Santal v. Pesce et al

Filing 37

ORDER. To the extent Defendants wish that discovery be stayed pending resolution of the motion to dismiss and believe they can meet the standards for making such a request, see, e.g., Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 201 3), then Defendants shall file a motion to stay discovery by June 8, 2017. Absent the filing of such a motion, the Court will enter a scheduling order sua sponte. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
PRISCELLA SAINTAL,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
MARIA PESCE, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15

Case No. 2:15-cv-02460-GMN-NJK
ORDER

16

In civil rights cases brought by prisoners, the Court generally enters a scheduling order sua

17

sponte upon the defendants’ appearance. Local Rule 16-1. In this case, Defendants have appeared by

18

filing a motion to dismiss. Docket No. 35. To the extent Defendants wish that discovery be stayed

19

pending resolution of the motion to dismiss and believe they can meet the standards for making such a

20

request, see, e.g., Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), then

21

Defendants shall file a motion to stay discovery by June 8, 2017. Absent the filing of such a motion,

22

the Court will enter a scheduling order sua sponte.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

DATED: June 1, 2017

25
26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge