Hulihan v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Recuse Judge Miranda M. Du from Case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 01/06/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 SHARON HULIHAN, an individual, 8 Case No. 2:15-cv-02469-MMD-VCF Plaintiff, ORDER v. 9 10 WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC. n/k/a WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for this Court to recuse. (Dkt. no. 6.) Plaintiff 14 cites two reasons to support her motion. First, Plaintiff explains that she is unable to 15 comply with the Standing Order’s requirement that counsel file documents in a 16 searchable PDF format with optical character recognition performed. This requirement 17 applies to counsel, not pro se litigants like Plaintiff. Second, Plaintiff asserts that she 18 has filed a jury demand and is entitled to trial by jury, and because of a protest involving 19 a ruling in an unrelated case by the undersigned, the undersigned should recuse. 20 However, Plaintiff’s case will proceed in federal court like all other cases and the 21 process that governs Plaintiff’s case is the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff 22 does not offer a valid reason for the Court to recuse. The reason offered does not show 23 a conflict or show that the Court’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Plaintiff’s 24 motion (dkt. no. 6) is denied. 25 DATED THIS 6th day of January 2016. . 26 27 28 MIRANDA M DU MIRANDA M. R UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?