Wilson v. MGM Resorts International, Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER denying 17 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. New proposed discovery plan that complies in full with LR 26-1 and 6-2(a) due by 4/13/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
DIONA WILSON,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
THE SIGNATURE CONDOMINIUMS, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:15-cv-02475-RCJ-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 17)

16

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 17.

17

Stipulations or unopposed motions requiring an order “shall include an ‘Order’ in the form of a

18

signature block on which the Court . . . can endorse approval of the relief sought.” Local Rule 6-2(a).

19

“This signature block shall not be on a separate page[.]” Id. The parties’ discovery plan includes an

20

Order in the form of a signature block, but it is on a separate page. Docket No. 17 at 4. Therefore, the

21

parties’ discovery plan is DENIED for failure to comply with Local Rule 6-2(a). The parties must file

22

a new joint proposed discovery plan that complies in full with Local Rules 26-1 and 6-2(a), no later than

23

April 13, 2016.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

DATED: April 11, 2016

26
27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge