Starrett v. National Security Technologies, LLC

Filing 14

ORDER Granting 13 Stipulation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is STAYED pending the conclusion of the arbitration. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Case 2:15-cv-02490-JAD-VCF Document 13 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 2

4

Elayna J. Youchah, Bar #5837
[e-mail]
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

5

Attorneys for Defendant

1
2
3

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9

DAWN STARRETT, an individual,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12
13

Case No. : 2:15-CV-02490-JAD-VCF

v.
NATIONAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES,
LLC, a limited liability company;
EMPLOYEE(S)/AGENTS(S) DOES I-X; and
ROE CORPORATIONS 11-20, inclusive,

14

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
ARBITRATE AND STAY
PROCEEDINGS

Defendant.

15
16

This stipulation is entered into by the parties, Dawn Starrett (“Plaintiff”) and National

17

Security Technologies, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through their counsel, with reference to the

18

following:

19

WHEREAS, during the course of her employment with Defendant, Plaintiff entered into

20

an agreement with Defendant pursuant to Defendant’s dispute resolution program to arbitrate all

21

disputes arising out of or relating to Plaintiff’s employment, or cessation of employment, with

22

Defendant (hereinafter the “Arbitration Agreement”);

23

WHEREAS, on September 30, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the Eighth Judicial

24

District Court, Clark County, Nevada, which Defendant removed to this Court pursuant to 28

25

U.S.C. § 1331, styled Dawn Starrett v. National Security Technologies, LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-

26

02490-JAD-VCF, alleging sex discrimination and retaliation under Title VII and Nevada state

27

law, and age discrimination under the ADA and Nevada state law (hereinafter the “Action”);

28
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Las Vegas

Case 2:15-cv-02490-JAD-VCF Document 13 Filed 02/29/16 Page 2 of 2

1
2

WHEREAS, the claims alleged in the Action fall within the scope of the Arbitration
Agreement;

3

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant as follows:

4

1.

The Action, in its entirety, shall be submitted to binding arbitration;

5

2.

All proceedings in this Action shall be stayed and this Court shall retain

6
7
8

jurisdiction over this Action pending the conclusion of the arbitration.
Dated this 29th day of February, 2016.
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

GABROY LAW OFFICE

/s/ Elayna J. Youchah
Elayna J. Youchah, Bar #5837
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Ste. 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

/s/ Christian Gabroy
Christian Gabroy, Bar #8805
Ivy Hensel, Bar #13502
170 S. Green Valley Pkwy, Ste. 280
Henderson, Nevada 89012

9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendant
Attorneys for Plaintiff

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

ORDER

Based SO ORDERED stipulation [ECF 13] and,good cause appearing, IT IS
IT IS on the parties’
2016.
HEREBY ORDERED this this is STAYED pending the the conclusion of
HEREBY ORDERED that that case case is STAYED pendingconclusion of the the
arbitration. The parties must
the court: (1) no
arbitration. The parties must file afile a joint status update withcourt: (1) no later
arbitration. The parties must file a joint status update with the court: (1) no
joint status update with the
thanlater than 30 daysarbitration date is scheduled, advising the courtcourt of
30 days after the after the arbitration date is scheduled, advising the court
the
laterof the30 days after the arbitration and (2) scheduled, advising the court of
than 30 days after the arbitration date is scheduled, advising the ofthe
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
later than scheduled arbitration date; date is no later than 30 days after
scheduled arbitration date; and andno later than 30 days after the hearing is held,
(2) (2) no later
the scheduled arbitration date; and (2) no later than 30 days after the hearing is
the scheduled held, advising the court that the than 30 daysconcluded and is
hearing is arbitration date;
hearing has after the hearing
advising the court courtthedate; andhas no later than 30whenwhenthe hearingis
the scheduled the that that the hearing has concludeddays after a decision is
arbitration hearing (2) concluded and and a decision is
held, advising
held, advising the court that the hearing has concluded and
when a
anticipated. decision is anticipated.
held, advising
anticipated. the court that the hearing has concluded and
held, advising the court that the hearing has concluded and when a decision is
anticipated.
anticipated.
Dated: February 29, 2016.
______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Las Vegas

2