Margaret Rudin v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections, et al.

Filing 85

ORDER that the Court DENIES the parties' amended joint proposed discovery plan (ECF No. 84 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

MARGARET RUDIN,

11

Plaintiff(s),

12

v.

13

NDOC, et al.,

14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:15-cv-02503-MMD-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 84)

16

Pending before the Court is the parties’ amended joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling

17

order seeking special scheduling review. Docket No. 84. On March 29, 2018, the Court granted the

18

parties’ joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Docket No. 80. Therefore, if the parties

19

request a change to the scheduled deadlines, they must file a request for extension of the existing

20

deadlines. See Local Rule 26-4.

21

Additionally, the parties submit they have agreed to “stay discovery as to the Board of Prison

22

Commissioners Defendants until after the Motion to Dismiss has been resolved.” Docket No. 84 at 2.

23

The parties, however, fail to address any of the standards required for a stay. Id. at 2.

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//

1
2

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, the Court DENIES the parties’ amended joint
proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 84.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

DATED: April 3, 2018

5
6

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2