Rodriguez v. United States of America, et al
Filing
67
ORDER granting 65 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Cal J. Potter, III and Cal J. Potter, IV withdrawn from the case. Attorney Ralph M. Rios shall have until November 1, 2017, in which to obtain pro hac vice counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
FEDERICO RODRIGUEZ,
7
8
9
Case No. 2:15-cv-02507-JCM-PAL
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
(Mot WD Atty – ECF No. 65)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
Defendants.
10
11
Before the court is counsel for plaintiff Potter Law Offices’ Motion to Withdraw as Pro
12
Hac Vice Counsel (ECF No. 65). The motion represents that plaintiff’s pro hac vice counsel
13
recently had brain surgery, is temporarily physically unable to practice law, and cannot continue
14
representation in this matter. There are only two attorneys in the law firm, and his associate who
15
is his son is unable to continue representing the plaintiff as pro hac vice counsel. As such, the firm
16
seeks leave to withdraw as pro hac vice counsel of record on behalf of attorney Ralph M. Rios for
17
plaintiff Federico Rodriguez. Plaintiff is also represented by Gilbert Geilim whose pro hac vice
18
counsel is Jared B. Anderson. As plaintiff is still represented by counsel, the withdrawal will cause
19
no delay in this matter.
20
Having reviewed and considered the matter, and for good cause shown,
21
IT IS ORDERED that:
22
1. Cal J. Potter, III and Cal J. Potter, IV’s Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 65) as pro hac
23
24
25
26
vice counsel is GRANTED.
2. Attorney Ralph M. Rios shall have until November 1, 2017, in which to obtain pro hac
vice counsel.
DATED this 18th day of October, 2017.
27
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?