Rodriguez v. United States of America, et al

Filing 67

ORDER granting 65 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Cal J. Potter, III and Cal J. Potter, IV withdrawn from the case. Attorney Ralph M. Rios shall have until November 1, 2017, in which to obtain pro hac vice counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 FEDERICO RODRIGUEZ, 7 8 9 Case No. 2:15-cv-02507-JCM-PAL Plaintiff, v. ORDER (Mot WD Atty – ECF No. 65) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. Defendants. 10 11 Before the court is counsel for plaintiff Potter Law Offices’ Motion to Withdraw as Pro 12 Hac Vice Counsel (ECF No. 65). The motion represents that plaintiff’s pro hac vice counsel 13 recently had brain surgery, is temporarily physically unable to practice law, and cannot continue 14 representation in this matter. There are only two attorneys in the law firm, and his associate who 15 is his son is unable to continue representing the plaintiff as pro hac vice counsel. As such, the firm 16 seeks leave to withdraw as pro hac vice counsel of record on behalf of attorney Ralph M. Rios for 17 plaintiff Federico Rodriguez. Plaintiff is also represented by Gilbert Geilim whose pro hac vice 18 counsel is Jared B. Anderson. As plaintiff is still represented by counsel, the withdrawal will cause 19 no delay in this matter. 20 Having reviewed and considered the matter, and for good cause shown, 21 IT IS ORDERED that: 22 1. Cal J. Potter, III and Cal J. Potter, IV’s Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 65) as pro hac 23 24 25 26 vice counsel is GRANTED. 2. Attorney Ralph M. Rios shall have until November 1, 2017, in which to obtain pro hac vice counsel. DATED this 18th day of October, 2017. 27 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?