Gant v. Williams et al
Filing
28
ORDER that a hearing on 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Properly Identify Defendants Not Served, and Request to Have Court Order Marshal to Serve Defendant Under Seal is scheduled for 10:00 AM, April 10, 2017, in Courtroom 3D. Plaintiff may appear telephonically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
5
LEMAR GANT,
6
Plaintiff,
7
8
vs.
BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,
9
2:16-cv-00011-JAD-VCF
ORDER
Defendants.
10
11
12
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Properly Identify Defendants Not Served, and Request to
13
Have Court Order Marshal to Serve Defendant Under Seal (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff is seeking to serve
14
Defendants Johnson and Chipo. Plaintiff states that Johnson is currently a caseworker at High Desert
15
Prison. Id.
16
No opposition has been filed. In the Answer, Defendants deny that “Johnson” is employed as a
17
Caseworker III at ESP. Defendants also deny that “Chipo” is employed by Nevada Department of
18
Correction. (ECF No. 19).
19
Accordingly,
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Properly Identify Defendants
21
Not Served, and Request to Have Court Order Marshal to Serve Defendant Under Seal (ECF No. 17) is
22
scheduled for 10:00 AM, April 10, 2017, in Courtroom 3D. Plaintiff may appear telephonically. The
23
Attorney General’s Office must contact Jerry Ries at 702-464-5416 to arrange Plaintiff’s telephonic
24
appearance by April 3, 2017.
25
1
2
3
If the Attorney General’s Office is able to locate Defendants Johnson and Chipo’s last known
address(es) and file them under seal, the hearing will be vacated.
DATED this 8th day of March, 2017.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?