Johnson v. Kraft Foods et al
Filing
21
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 16 ) and Motion for an Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 17 ) are denied. without prejudice as premature. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for a Status Check (ECF No. 19 ) is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
KRAFT FOODS dba MAXWELL HOUSE, et al., )
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:16-cv-00042-MMD-GWF
ORDER
11
12
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No.
13
16), filed on October 20, 2016, Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 17), filed
14
on November 2, 2016 and Motion for Status Check (ECF No. 19), filed on May 8, 2017.
15
Plaintiff filed a revised Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 15)
16
on October 17, 2016. Following such an application, the Court will conduct a screening of
17
Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. To date, the Court has not issued its screening
18
order in this matter and will do so in due course. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of
19
attorney and motion for an order to show cause are premature as litigation of this matter has not yet
20
commenced. Accordingly,
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No.
22
16) and Motion for an Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 17) are denied without prejudice as
23
premature.
24
25
26
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for a Status Check (ECF No. 19) is
granted.
DATED this 17th day of August, 2017.
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?