Yager v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER that 20 Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically is GRANTED with provision as enumerated in the order. FURTHER ORDERED that 21 Motion to Extend Time to Reply re 14 Motion for Reversal is GRANTED. Replies due by 6/8/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 ROBIN ROSE PETERSON YAGER, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 vs. 9 2:16-cv-00051-GMN-VCF NANCY A. BERRYHILL1, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. ORDER 10 Defendant. 11 12 Before the court is pro se Plaintiff's Motion to File Electronically and to Extend the time to file a 13 reply to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal (ECF Nos. 20 and 21). 14 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to File Electronically and to Extend the time to file a reply 15 to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal (ECF Nos. 20 and 21) is GRANTED with the 16 following provisions: 17 1. On or before May 22, 2017, Plaintiff must provide certification that she has completed the 18 CM/ECF tutorial and is familiar with the Electronic Case Filing of the Local Rules that is 19 accessible on this Court’s website. 20 2. Plaintiff is not authorized to file electronically until said certification is filed with the Court 21 within the time frame specified. 22 23 24 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. 1 25 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time to file a reply to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal (ECF No. 19) is extended to June 8, 2017. DATED this 8th day of May, 2017. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?