Momox-Caselis v. Juarez-Paez, et al.,

Filing 106

ORDER Granting 105 Stipulation to Extend Discovery (Fifth Request). Discovery due by 3/2/2018. Motions due by 4/3/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/30/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00054-APG-GWF Document 105 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FELICIA GALATI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7341 OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY ANGULO & STOBERSKI 9950 West Cheyenne Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89129 fgalati@ocgas.com Telephone: 702-384-4012 Facsimile: 702-383-0701 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF CLARK, TARA DONOHUE, LISA RUIZ-LEE, KIM KALLAS, PATRICIA MEYERS, JEREMY LAW, IRENE KOZICKI, SHUUANDY ALVAREZ, LANI AITKEN AND OSCAR BENAVIDES 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Law Offices of OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY, ANGULO & STOBERSKI A Professional Corporation 9950 West Cheyenne Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 (702) 384-4012 Telecopier (702) 383-0701 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 16 SERGIO MOMOX-CASELIS, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for MARIA MOMOX-CASELIS; NICOLASA HERNANDEZ, as Special Administrator of the estate of M.M., born May 15, 2013 and died October 12, 2014, 17 Plaintiffs, 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00054-APG-GWF v. MAIRA JUAREZ-PAEZ; LISA RUIZLEE; KIM KALLAS; TARA DONAHUE; PATRICIA MEYERS; JEREMY LAW; IRENE KOZIKI; SHUUANDY ALVAREZ; LANI AITKEN; OSCAR BENEVIDES, individuals; Estate of JOAQUIN JUAREZ-PAEZ; DOE individuals I-X; ROE CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES EMPLOYEES XIII-XX, individually and in their official capacities; CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES; COUNTY OF CLARK, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; and ZOE CORPORATIONS XXI-XXX, Defendants. 28 Page 1 of 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY (Fifth Request) Case 2:16-cv-00054-APG-GWF Document 105 Filed 11/27/17 Page 2 of 5 1 Pursuant to FRCP 6 and FRCP 26, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of 2 record, hereby stipulate and agree to jointly move this Court for an Order to extend the discovery 3 deadlines, as set forth below. 4 1. Extend the date to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses from 12/4/17 to 1/31/18 5 2. Extend the discovery cut-off deadline from 1/4/2018 to 3/2/18 6 3. Extend the date to file dispositive motions from 2/5/18 to 4/3/18 7 4. Extend the date to file the Joint Pre-Trial Order from 3/4/18 to 4/30/18 8 5. Extend the date to file Pre-Trial Disclosures or objections to the Pre-Trial Order 9 10 from 4/3/2018 to 6/27/18 I. DISCOVERY COMPLETED Law Offices of OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY, ANGULO & STOBERSKI A Professional Corporation 9950 West Cheyenne Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 (702) 384-4012 Telecopier (702) 383-0701 11 Defendants COUNTY OF CLARK, CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF 12 FAMILY SERVICES, TARA DONOHUE, LISA RUIZ-LEE, KIM KALLAS, BETH ANN 13 NELSON, JEREMY LAW, IRENE KOZIKI, and SHUUANDY ALVAREZ (“Defendants”) 14 provided their initial witness and document disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) on April 19, 15 2016, and have since provided 15 supplemental disclosures. To date, Defendants have disclosed 16 thousands of pages of documents. Plaintiffs provided their initial witness and document 17 disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) on April 15, 2016. 18 Defendants propounded written discovery (interrogatories, requests for production and 19 requests for admission) to Plaintiffs SERGIO MOMOX-CASELIS, MARIA MOMOX- 20 CASELIS and NICOLASA HERNANDEZ (“Plaintiffs”) and Plaintiffs responded thereto. 21 22 Plaintiffs propounded written discovery (interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission) to Defendants, and Defendants responded thereto. 23 24 The following depositions have been taken to date: Kim Kallas, Patricia Meyers, Maria Juarez-Paez, Shuuandy Alvarez, Lani Aitken, Oscar Benavides and Sergio Momox. 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs have disclosed their initial expert witnesses in accordance with FRCP 26(a)(2). II. GROUNDS FOR DISCOVERY EXTENSION: This case is complicated due to the number of parties and the circumstances of this case, including the fact that there are two sets of foster parents relevant to and that are parties in this Page 2 of 5 Case 2:16-cv-00054-APG-GWF Document 105 Filed 11/27/17 Page 3 of 5 1 action. As such, there are twice as many documents to disclose and many more depositions that 2 will need to be taken. While Defendants have produced the most of their documents in this case, 3 they still have additional documents to produce that need to be reviewed and redacted as to other 4 minors, including pursuant to their obligations under NRS 432B.280 and NRS 432B.290, before 5 those documents can be produced. At present, Defendants have identified approximately 91 6 other minors indicated in their records. 7 After Defendant Maira Juarez-Paez’s deposition was taken on May 20, 2017, additional 8 alleged information came to light requiring a further search for any additional information, 9 documents and witnesses relating thereto, which Defendants began, but are in the process of continuing to do. Thus, additional time is needed for Defendants to complete that search to 11 Law Offices of OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY, ANGULO & STOBERSKI A Professional Corporation 9950 West Cheyenne Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 (702) 384-4012 Telecopier (702) 383-0701 10 determine if there is any additional information, documents and witnesses that need to be 12 disclosed in this case. The document search is not limited to within Defendant’s possession, 13 custody and/or control but is extending, in part, beyond that. Defendants have disclosed an 14 additional 14 exhibits, amounting to about 487 pages of documents, photos and other items, 15 obtained through the above search and have additional documents to obtain and disclose. The 16 documents relate in large part to Maira Juarez-Paez’s deposition testimony and are critical to the 17 facts and issues in this case. 18 The parties are in the process of finalizing a substitution of parties. Plaintiff Sergio 19 Momox will be substituted in and for Plaintiff Nicolasa Hernandez, and Plaintiff Nicolasa 20 Hernandez will be dismissed as a Plaintiff in this case. 21 All parties have been diligently conducting discovery in this case. Defendants disclosed 22 several thousand pages of records. Additionally, Defendants have designated 158 witnesses to 23 date, and additional documents and other witnesses need to be disclosed and perhaps deposed. 24 25 26 27 Defendants intend to disclose their expert rebuttal witness(es), and depositions may need to be taken of the expert witnesses. The parties might conduct additional COR depositions related to the case depending on any newly discovered additional information and/or documents disclosed in this case. 28 Page 3 of 5 Case 2:16-cv-00054-APG-GWF Document 105 Filed 11/27/17 Page 4 of 5 1 Based on the above, additional discovery needs to be done as indicated herein. As such, 2 there is good cause to extend the discovery deadlines. Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate and 3 request that this Court extend discovery in the above-captioned case for another 58 days, up to 4 and including 3/2/18, 2018, due to all of the above. 5 III. 6 DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED: A. 7 Plaintiffs: 1. 8 and/or any additional witnesses disclosed by Defendants; 9 2. 10 Plaintiffs require additional time to designate any additional experts and consider rebuttal experts. 11 Law Offices of OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY, ANGULO & STOBERSKI A Professional Corporation 9950 West Cheyenne Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 (702) 384-4012 Telecopier (702) 383-0701 Plaintiffs would like to take the depositions of other named Defendants 3. Plaintiffs may want to take the deposition of any designated expert 12 3. Plaintiffs may propound additional written discovery upon Defendant. 13 B. Defendants: 14 1. 15 Defendants would like to take the depositions of additional witnesses disclosed by either party; 16 2. Defendants require additional time to designate rebuttal experts. 17 3. Defendants may propound additional written discovery upon Plaintiff. 18 4. Defentants may want to take the deposition of any designated expert. 19 The parties will continue to work together to get the remaining discovery done and 20 depositions completed. 21 .... 22 .... 23 .... 24 .... 25 .... 26 .... 27 .... 28 .... Page 4 of 5 Case 2:16-cv-00054-APG-GWF Document 105 Filed 11/27/17 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 IV. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING DISCOVERY: The parties have agreed to extend all of the discovery deadlines in this case by 58 days, as set forth below: 4 1. Extend the date to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses from 12/4/17 to 1/31/18 5 2. Extend the discovery cut-off deadline from 1/4/2018 to 3/2/18 6 3. Extend the date to file dispositive motions from 2/5/18 to 4/3/18 7 4. Extend the date to file the Joint Pre-Trial Order from 3/4/18 to 4/30/18 8 5. Extend the date to file Pre-Trial Disclosures or objections to the Pre-Trial Order 9 from 4/3/2018 to 6/27/18 10 Law Offices of OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY, ANGULO & STOBERSKI A Professional Corporation 9950 West Cheyenne Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 (702) 384-4012 Telecopier (702) 383-0701 11 DATED this 27th day of November, 2017. DATED this 27th day of November, 2017. 12 GANZ & HAUF 13 OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY ANGULO & STOBERSKI /s/ Marjorie Hauf 14 15 16 17 18 MARJORIE HAUF, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 008111 ADAM GANZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 00650 8950 W. Tropicana Avenue, Suite 1 Las Vegas, NV 89147 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 19 20 21 22 /s/ Felicia Galati WALTER R. CANNON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.1505 FELICIA GALATI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7341 9950 W. Cheyenne Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89129 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF CLARK, TARA DONOHUE, LISA RUIZ-LEE, KIM KALLAS, PATRICIA MEYERS, JEREMY LAW, IRENE KOZICKI, SHUUANDY ALVAREZ, LANI AITKEN AND OSCAR BENAVIDES 23 ORDER 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED: _____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 November 28, Dated: ____________ 2017 Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?