Soto v. Aria Resort & Casino, LLC et al
ORDER Granting 94 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Robert A Rabbat for Defendant Philippe Rouas. Defendant has until 2/13/2017 to retain substitute counsel who shall make an appearance. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the Plaintiff with a copy of this Order at his last known address (see Order for address). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/23/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - copy mailed to Defendant Philippe Rouas - SLD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 2:16-cv-00064-JAD-PAL
(Mot WD Atty – ECF No. 94)
ARIA RESORT & CASINO, LLC, et al.,
Before the court is Mr. Rabbat’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant Philippe
Rouas (ECF No. 94). The motion represents that Mr. Rouas has failed to meet his obligations for
services rendered by Mr. Rabbat. Mr. Rabbat therefore seeks leave to withdraw as counsel of
Having reviewed and considered the matter, and for good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED:
Mr. Rabbat’s Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 94) is GRANTED.
Defendant Philippe Rouas shall have until February 13, 2017, in which to retain
substitute counsel who shall make an appearance in accordance with the
requirements of the Local Rules of Practice, or shall file a notice with the court that
he will be appearing in this matter pro se.
Mr. Rouas’ failure to timely comply with this order by either obtaining substitute
counsel, or filing a notice that he will be appearing in this matter pro se may result
in the imposition of sanctions, which may include a recommendation to the District
Judge for default judgment against him for failure to prosecute.
The Clerk of the Court shall serve the plaintiff with a copy of this order at his last
4045 S. Buffalo Dr., Suite A101-124
Las Vegas, NV 89147
DATED this 23rd day of January, 2017.
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?