The Estate of Stephen Thomas Cary, Jr. v. United States of America
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Stipulation; Discovery due by 3/15/2018. Motions due by 4/16/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:16-cv-00067-JAD-GWF Document 23 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 3
1 STEVEN W. MYHRE
Acting United States Attorney
2 District of Nevada
3 LINDSY M. ROBERTS
Assistant United States Attorney
4 501 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
5 Telephone: 702-388-6336
Email: lindsy.roberts@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for the United States.
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11 THE ESTATE OF
STEPHEN THOMAS CARY, JR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
15
Defendant.
16
)
)
) Case No. 2:16-cv-00067-JAD-GWF
)
)
)
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
) SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES
)
)
(Fifth Request)
)
)
17
18
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1, 26-4, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), the parties stipulate, subject
19 to this Court’s approval, that the deadlines in the approved discovery schedule be extended as
20 set forth below. The parties assert that good cause exists for the requested extension.
21
1.
Status Report. Discovery is currently set to close on December 15, 2017. This
22 request is made more than 21 days prior to that cutoff date solely for the purpose of extending
23 the deadline to conduct depositions while the parties are actively engaged in settlement
24 negotiations. The parties assert that good cause exists to extend the deadline as set forth in
25 Paragraph 4. Additionally, should this stipulation be approved by the Court, it will facilitate and
26 increase the possibility of resolution without the parties having to balance upcoming deadlines.
27 The parties do not anticipate seeking any further extension of the discovery period should the
28 Court grant this stipulation.
1
Case 2:16-cv-00067-JAD-GWF Document 23 Filed 11/20/17 Page 2 of 3
2.
1
Status/Discovery Completed. The parties have completed the following
2 discovery:
•
3
Initial and supplemental disclosures have been made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
26(a)(1)(C).
4
5
•
The parties have exchanged written discovery.
6
•
The parties have exchanged expert witness disclosures.
7
•
Depositions of fact witnesses.
3.
8
Discovery remaining. The only outstanding discovery is depositions of expert
9 witnesses and potentially Plaintiff’s treating physicians and health care providers, all of whom
10 are/were employed by Defendant.
4.
11
Reasons for extension. The parties request this extension to provide them with
12 the time to facilitate potential resolution of the matter. The parties are actively engaged in
13 settlement negotiations and both parties are hopeful that a resolution can be reached in the near
14 future. The parties continue to negotiate in good faith and request this extension to avoid
15 potentially costly expert depositions.
5.
16
Revised discovery schedule. The parties stipulate and agree to a 90-day
17 extension of the discovery deadline. The parties agree to the following revisions to the
18 discovery plan and ask that the Court adopt it as the revised scheduling order in this case.
A.
19
Depositions: The parties agree and respectfully request that the discovery
20 cutoff date be extended from December 15, 2017 to March 15, 2018, for the limited purpose of
21 completing depositions.
B.
22
Dispositive Motions: The parties request that the Court extend the
1
23 deadline to file dispositive motions, if any, to April 16, 2018 , which is 30 days after the
24 proposed discovery cutoff.
25
26
27
1
Deadlines falling on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday have been rolled to the next day that is not a
28 Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(C).
2
Case 2:16-cv-00067-JAD-GWF Document 23 Filed 11/20/17 Page 3 of 3
1
C.
Pretrial Order: The parties request that the Court extend the deadline to
2 file the Pretrial Order to May 16, 2018, which is 30 days after the deadline for filing dispositive
3 motions. However, if any dispositive motions are filed, then the Pretrial Order shall be due 30
4 days after decisions on such motion(s). Disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any
5 objections thereto shall be included in the Joint Pretrial Order.
6
Respectfully submitted this 20th day of November 2017.
7 PAUL PADDA LAW, PLLC
STEVEN W. MYHRE
Acting United States Attorney
8
/s/ Paul Padda
9 PAUL PADDA, ESQ.
4240 West Flamingo Rd, Suite 220
10 Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
Attorney for Plaintiff
11
/s/ Lindsy M. Roberts
LINDSY M. ROBERTS
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the United States
12
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED:
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
DATED:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
11/21/2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?