Skinner v. Geico Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 47

ORDER Granting 46 Stipulation to Extend Time re 34 MOTION for Summary Judgment On Plaintiffs' Claim For Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Statutory Violations, Negligent Misrepresentation and Punitive Damages. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00078-APG-NJK Document 46 Filed 07/20/17 Page 1 of 2 1 ROBERT W. FREEMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 03062 2 Email: robert.freeman@lewisbrisbois.com PRISCILLA L. O’BRIANT, ESQ. 3 Nevada Bar No. 10171 Email: priscilla.obriant@lewisbrisbois.com 4 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 702.893.3383 6 FAX: 702.893.3789 Attorneys for Defendant 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA, SOUTHERN DIVISION 10 MARISSA SKINNER, individually, 11 CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-00078-APG-NJK Plaintiff, 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S vs. 13 GEICO CASUALTY INSURANCE 14 COMPANY, individually; and DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I 15 through X, inclusive, 16 (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 17 18 Pursuant to LR 6-1, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, 19 respectfully submit the following stipulation requesting a seven (7) day extension for Plaintiff and 20 Defendant to file their replies, namely, Plaintiff's reply in support of Plaintiff’s Motion for 21 Summary Judgment Regarding Defendant’s Breach of Contract [dkt. ] and Defendant's 22 reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claim for Breach of the 23 Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Statutory Violations, Negligent 24 Misrepresentation, Statutory Violations, Negligent Misrepresentation and Punitive Damages 25 [dkt. 34], to and including July 28. Both parties' Motions were filed on June 2, and both 26 parties responses to the Motions were filed on July 7, 2017. In support of this Stipulation, the 27 parties state as follows: LEWIS 28 / / / BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4824-0226-1575.1 Case 2:16-cv-00078-APG-NJK Document 46 Filed 07/20/17 Page 2 of 2 1 A. Introduction 2 Plaintiff is a first party claimant for underinsured motorist benefits under a policy of 3 insurance with Defendant GEICO Casualty Insurance Company 4 B. Reason for Extension 5 The parties believe that a seven (7) day extension of the deadline to file a reply is necessary 6 and appropriate to provide sufficient time to complete an adequate reply. Defendant’s counsel 7 requested the extension since she was traveling for business the week prior and due to various 8 factors, the travel adversely interfered with Defendant’s opportunity to complete Defendant’s 9 reply in support of its motion for summary judgment. The parties believe that good cause is 10 demonstrated and both agreed to a seven (7) day extension of the deadline to respond. 11 DATED this 20tht day of July, 2017. DATED this 20th day of July, 2017. 12 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH CLARK MCCOURT /s/ Priscilla L. O’Briant _______________________________ ROBERT W. FREEMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 003062 PRISCILLA L. O’BRIANT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10171 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Attorneys for Defendant /s/ Lukas B. McCourt _______________________________ BRIAN P. CLARK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 04236 LUKAS B. MCCOURT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11839 7371 Prairie Falcon Road, Ste. 120 Las Vegas, NV 89128 Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED: 22 Dated this _____ day Dated: July 20, 2017. of _____________, 2017. 23 24 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 LEWIS 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4824-0226-1575.1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?