Gomez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 38

ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond re: 26 and 27 Motions for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 2/16/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Case 2:16-cv-00086-APG-VCF Document 37 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

Craig A. Mueller, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 4703
MUELLER, HINDS & ASSOCIATES, CHTD.
600 South Eighth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
[phone] Ph
[phone] Fx
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT

7
8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

DANIEL GOMEZ,
Plaintiff,

11
12

Case No. 2:16-CV-00086-APG-VCF

vs.

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFEANDA’TS MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

17

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a polital subdivision of the
State of Nevada; BRIAN SANTAROSSA
Second Request
P#6930, individually; and DOE OFFICERS 1
through 25, individually and ROE ENTITIES
1 through 25, inclusive.
Defendants.
The above-referenced parties, by and through their counsels of record, hereby agree and

18

stipulate to extend the deadline to file an opposition to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment

13
14
15
16

19
20

[ECF Nos. 26 and 27] currently set for January 17, 2017, for an additional thirty (30) days, until

21

February 16, 2018. This is the second requested extension of this deadline between the parties. The

22

extension is being requested as Plaintiff’s Counsel withdrew from this case due to an illness as this

23

Court is aware. The Court gave Plaintiff until December 18, 2017 to file his oppositions to the

24
25

motions. [ECF No. 33]. Plaintiff and Defendant’s counsel entered a Stipulation for Extension [ECF

26

34] allowing Plaintiff till January 17, 2018 to file his Opposition. Plaintiff’s current counsel was just

27

recently retained, just received a copy of the file one week ago, and Counsel was out of town this past

28

week arguing a case before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and has not had time to properly review
1

Case 2:16-cv-00086-APG-VCF Document 37 Filed 01/17/18 Page 2 of 2

1

and/or prepare an Opposition. The extension will not prejudice any party and will allow the parties to

2

properly brief their dispositive motions for this Court. The parties are not delaying the conclusion of

3
4
5

this matter by way of trial or otherwise; no trial date has yet been ordered.
DATED this 17th day of January, 2018.

6
7

MUELLER HINDS & ASSOCIATES, CHTD.

KAEMPER CROMWELL

__/s/ Craig A. Mueller
____________
CRAIG A. MUELLER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4703
600 S. Eighth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorney for Plaintiff

__/s/ Lyssa S. Anderson___________________
LYSSA S. ANDERSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5781
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, #650
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Attorney for Defendants

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ORDER
UPON A READING of the foregoing stipulation of the Parties in the above-referenced matter
and good cause appearing therefore.

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of _________________________________, 2018.
this 18th day of January, 2018.

19
____________________________________
FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22

Respectfully submitted by:

23

/s/ Craig A. Mueller______________
CRAIG A. MUELLER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4703
MUELLER HINDS & ASSOCIATES, CHTD.
600 S. Eighth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
[e-mail]

24
25
26
27
28

2