Ditech Financial LLC v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 148

ORDER denying 112 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER denying 114 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER granting 147 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice as to Twilight Homeowners Association; Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00127-GMN-NJK Document 147 Filed 04/02/18 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7287 SCOTT D. FLEMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5638 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 362-7800 Facsimile: (702) 362-9472 E-Mail: mbrooks@klnevada.com sfleming@klnevada.com Attorneys for Plaintiff DITECH FINANCIAL LLC and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Assetbacked Certificates Series 2005-17 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 *** 15 CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00127-GMN-NJK DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, 16 Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 19 20 21 SFR INVESTMENTS POOL I, LLC; BOULDER RANCH MASTER ASSOCIATION; TWILIGHT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.; HARMESH SINGH; KULJIT KAUR; DOES 1-20, Inclusive, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ALL CLAIMS BY DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC AGAINST TWILIGHT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 22 Defendants. 23 24 SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, Counterclaimant, 25 26 27 vs. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, Counter-Defendant. 28 2856350 (10190-2) Page 1 of 5 Case 2:16-cv-00127-GMN-NJK Document 147 Filed 04/02/18 Page 2 of 5 1 SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, 2 Cross-Claimant, 3 4 5 6 7 8 vs. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK as Trustee for the CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWABS, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-J12 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2005-17; HOUSEHOLD FINANCE REALTY CORPORATION OF NEVADA; HARMESH SINGH, an individual; and KULJIT KAUR, an individual, 9 Cross-Defendants. 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 11 This Stipulation to Dismiss With Prejudice All Claims by Ditech Financial, LLC Against 12 Twilight Homeowners Association (the “Stipulation”) is made by and among Plaintiff/Counter- 13 Defendant/Cross-Defendant Ditech Financial, LLC (“Ditech”), Cross-Defendant The Bank of 14 New York Mellon Corporation as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset- 15 backed Certificates Series 2005-17 (“BONY Mellon” and with Ditech, “Lenders”), and 16 Defendant Twilight Homeowners Association (“Twilight HOA”), and is based on the following 17 facts: 18 19 RECITALS 1. On January 22, 2016, Ditech commenced this action by filing its Complaint for 20 Declaratory Relief and Quite Title to Real Property [ECF No. 1] (the “Complaint”) naming as 21 Defendants SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”), Boulder Ranch Master Association 22 (“Boulder Ranch”), Twilight HOA, Homeowners Association Services, Inc. (“HAS”), Harmesh 23 Singh (“Singh”) and Kuljit Kaur (“Kaur”). 24 2. In its Complaint, Ditech alleged, among other things, that as a result of a series of 25 assignments, Ditech was the beneficiary of a certain deed of trust (the “Deed of Trust”) recorded 26 in the Clark County Recorder’s Office, Clark County, Nevada, as Instrument No. 20051130- 27 0005884, naming Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (“Countrywide”) as the lender and Mortgage 28 Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) as the beneficiary. 2856350 (10190-2) Page 2 of 5 Case 2:16-cv-00127-GMN-NJK Document 147 Filed 04/02/18 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3. The Deed of Trust encumbers certain real property commonly described as 5929 Crumbling Ridge, Henderson, Nevada 89011 (“Property”). 3 4. The Deed of Trust secures a promissory note (“Note”) signed by Harmesh Singh 4 and Kuljit Kaur, husband and wife as joint tenants (“Borrowers”), on November 22, 2005, stating 5 that Borrowers owe Countrywide $276,250.00 plus interest. 6 7 5. The Property is located in a common-interest community in which Boulder Ranch is the master association and Twilight HOA is a sub-association. 8 6. On or about July 7, 2009, HAS, acting as collection agent for Boulder Ranch 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 HOA, recorded a Notice of Claim of Lien-Homeowner Assessment (the “Boulder Ranch Lien”) 10 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 9 against the Property in the Clark County Recorder’s Office, Clark County, Nevada, as Instrument 11 No. 200907070001893. 12 7. On or about October 21, 2009, HAS, acting as collection agent for Boulder 13 Ranch, recorded a Notice of Default and Election to Sell in the Clark County Recorder’s Office, 14 Clark County, Nevada, as Instrument No. 200910210001899. 15 8. On or about July 24, 2012, HAS, acting as collection agent for Twilight HOA, 16 recorded a Notice of Claim of Lien-Homeowner Assessment (the "Twilight Lien") against the 17 Property in the Clark County Recorder’s Office, Clark County, Nevada, as Instrument No. 18 201207240001224. 19 9. On or about February 24, 2014, HAS, acting as collection agent for Boulder 20 Ranch, recorded a Notice of Sale in the Clark County Recorder’s Office, Clark County, Nevada, 21 as Instrument No. 201402240001318, scheduling a foreclosure sale of the Property to occur on 22 March 13, 2014. 23 10. On July 10, 2014, HAS, as designated agent of Boulder Ranch HOA, executed a 24 certain Foreclosure Deed Upon Sale (the “Foreclosure Deed”) conveying an interest in the 25 Property, without covenant, or warranty, to SFR. The Foreclosure Deed was recorded on August 26 14, 2014 as Instrument No. 201408140001068. 27 / / / 28 / / / 2856350 (10190-2) Page 3 of 5 Case 2:16-cv-00127-GMN-NJK Document 147 Filed 04/02/18 Page 4 of 5 1 11. The Foreclosure Deed recites that a sale occurred on July 10, 2014 and that the 2 grantee, SFR, acquired the Property “for $21,000 cash, lawful money of the United States, in full 3 satisfaction of the indebtedness secured by Grantor’s lien.” 4 12. A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Property to SFR may have been 5 used to satisfy the amounts due under the Twilight Lien; however, to the extent Twilight HOA 6 may be entitled to any portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Property to SFR, the HOA 7 waives all such entitlement. 8 13. 9 In its Complaint, Ditech asserted the following claims for relief: a. Declaratory Relief against all Defendants. Ditech sought, among other things, a declaration regarding the “parties’ respective interests in the Property.” 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 11 b. Quiet Title against SFR and Twilight HOA. Ditech sought “judgment quieting title to the Property in the Plaintiff’s favor.” 12 13 c. Accounting against Boulder Ranch, Twilight HOA and HAS. Ditech sought 14 “an accounting of the disposition of all sums received from the sale of the 15 Property.” 16 14. Twilight HOA acknowledges and agrees that as a result of the non-judicial 17 foreclosure by Boulder Ranch, all of its interests in the Property regarding the Twilight Lien 18 were extinguished and that as of the date of this Stipulation, Twilight HOA disclaims any interest 19 in the Property other than its ongoing rights under Nevada law, including NRS 116, and the 20 governing documents, including the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (“CC&Rs”). 21 15. Lenders and Twilight HOA have agreed, in light of Twilight HOA’s 22 acknowledgment that it holds no further interest in the Property, to dismiss all claims against one 23 another, with prejudice. 24 25 STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT Based on the foregoing Recitals, Lenders and Twilight HOA (the “Parties”) stipulate and 26 agree as follows: 27 A. 28 The Parties jointly request entry by this Court of an order dismissing this action with prejudice as set forth below. 2856350 (10190-2) Page 4 of 5 Case 2:16-cv-00127-GMN-NJK Document 147 Filed 04/02/18 Page 5 of 5 1 B. The Parties shall each bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 2 C. The dismissal of Twilight HOA as a party shall not affect the rights or arguments 3 that may be presented by the remaining Parties during any trial in this matter, all of which are 4 expressly reserved. 5 D. Depositions of Twilight HOA’s employees, officers and agents may be used at the 6 time of trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 32 even though Twilight HOA is hereby dismissed as an 7 “adverse party.” 8 Dated: April 2, 2018 Dated: April 2, 2018 9 KOLESAR & LEATHAM LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER & GARIN, P.C. 400 S. Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 TEL: (702) 362-7800 / FAX: (702) 362-9472 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 /s/ Scott D. Fleming, Esq. MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7287 SCOTT D. FLEMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5638 400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 /s/ Amber M. Williams, Esq. JOSEPH P. GARIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6653 J. WILLIAM EBERT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 2697 AMBER M. WILLIAMS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12301 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Attorneys for Plaintiff DITECH FINANCIAL Las Vegas, NV 89144 LLC and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION as Trustee for the Attorneys for Defendant Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset- Twilight Homeowners Association backed Certificates Series 2005-17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER Based on the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Twilight Homeowners Association is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Twilight Homeowners Association's Motions, (ECF Nos. 112, 114), are DENIED as moot. 25 26 2 Dated this ____ day of April, 2018. 27 28 2856350 (10190-2) ______________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?