Jiuzhou Jena Co., LTD v. EZSupply INC.
Filing
15
ORDER granting Plaintiff's ECF No. 11 Motion for Default Judgment. Submission of Proposed Order due with 7 days. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
***
11
JIUZHOU JENA CO., LTD, a Delaware
corporation,
12
Case No. 2:16-cv-00142-MMD-NJK
ORDER
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
EZSUPPLY INC., a Nevada corporation
d/b/a EZ CORPORATION and DOES 110, inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
This action arises from Defendant EZSupply Inc.’s alleged failure to pay for
19
consumer electronics products purchased from Plaintiff Jiuzhou Jena Co. Ltd. (ECF No.
20
1.) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 11.) The Court
21
has reviewed the Complaint, proof of service on Defendant and the Motion and exhibits
22
attached thereto. (ECF Nos. 1, 6, 11, 12, 13.) The Court finds that default judgment is
23
proper. Plaintiff has satisfied the procedural requirements for default judgment pursuant
24
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). The Clerk properly entered a default against Defendant pursuant
25
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) because Defendant has failed to appear after having been
26
properly served. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff has also satisfied the factors for obtaining default
27
judgment articulated in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986). Plaintiff’s
28
Motion demonstrates that it is entitled to default judgment in the amount of $5,188,892.50.
1
It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 11) is
2
granted. Plaintiff is directed to submit a proposed order granting its motion within seven
3
(7) days.
4
5
DATED THIS 19th day of May 2017.
6
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?