Jiuzhou Jena Co., LTD v. EZSupply INC.
Filing
20
JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 5/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
JIUZHOU JENA CO., LTD, a
10 Delaware Corporation,
11
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:16-cv-00142-MMD-NJK
12
Hon. Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge
13
v.
EZSUPPLY INC., a Nevada
14 Corporation d/b/a EZ
CORPORATION and DOES 1-10,
15 Inclusive,
16
Hon. Miranda M. Du,
United States District Judge
FINAL JUDGMENT
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The court has ordered that the plaintiff, JIUZHOU JENA CO., LTD, a Delaware
Corporation recover from the defendant, EZSUPPLY INC., a Nevada Corporation
d/b/a EZ CORPORATION with its principal offices in Clark County, Nevada, the
amount of Five Million, One Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand, Eight Hundred NinetyTwo dollars and fifty cents ($5,188,892.50), which includes prejudgment interest,
pursuant to NEV. REV. STAT. § 17.130, at the rate of five and one-half percent (5.5%)
from January 29, 2016 until December 31, 2016 and five and three-fourths percent
(5.75%) from January 1, 2017 until the date of this judgment, plus post-judgment
interest, including on the amount of the judgment and the amount of pre-judgment
interest, at the rate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, namely, at a rate equal to the weekly
average one-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of
1 Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the calendar week preceding the date
2 of the judgment, along with costs.
3
This action was decided by Judge on a motion for default judgment.
4
Defendants Does 1-10, Inclusive have been dismissed by notice.
5
6 Date: ________________
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
May 30, 2017
CLERK OF COURT
By: ______________________________
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?