Federal National Mortgage Association v. Canyon Willow Owners Association, et al.
ORDER. IT IS that 37 Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association's motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 36 if Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association's motion for summary judgment is denied, the parties must meet and confer and file a revised proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 21 days from the date of the order on the motion for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
CANYON WILLOW OWNERS ASSOCIATION, )
Case No. 2:16-cv-00203-JCM-CWH
Presently before the court is Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association’s motion to
stay discovery (ECF No. 37), filed on February 3, 2017. Defendants did not file a response.
(Notice of Non-Opp’n (ECF No. 39).)
Plaintiff moves to stay discovery pending the district judge’s order on its motion for
summary judgment, arguing that its motion for summary judgment is potentially dispositive of the
entire case and that discovery is not required to decide the motion. Having read and considered the
unopposed motion, and good cause appearing, the court will grant the motion. See LR 7-2(d)
(stating that the “failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any
motion . . . constitutes a consent to granting of the motion”).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association’s
motion to stay discovery (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association’s
motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 36) is denied, the parties must meet and confer and file a
revised proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 21 days from the date of the order on
the motion for summary judgment.
DATED: March 1, 2017
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?