John Doe I, et al., v. Jeremiah Mazo, et al.,

Filing 36

ORDER Granting 32 Stipulation for CCSD to Produce Names of CCSD Students and to Extend Deadline for Motion for Class Certification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00239-APG-PAL Document 32 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3402 ARTEMUS W. HAM, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7001 AARON D. FORD, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7704 EGLET PRINCE 400 S. 7th Street, 4th Floor Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel.: (702) 450-5400 Fax: (702) 450-5451 E-Mail eservice@egletwall.com Attorney for Plaintiffs 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 14 JOHN and JANE DOE I, Guardians Ad Litem for JOANN DOE I, a minor, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, and JOHN and JANE DOE II, Guardians Ad Litem for JOANN DOE II, a minor, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated; Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 18 19 CASE No.: 2:16-cv-00239-APG-PAL STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CCSD TO PRODUCE NAMES OF CCSD STUDENTS AND TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION vs. JEREMIAH MAZO; CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; DOES 1 though 20; DOE 1 through 20; ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through 20. Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs and undersigned counsel for Clark County School District (hereinafter “CCSD”) that CCSD shall produce the names and most current contact information for the parents of all CCSD students who contacted CCSD administration with allegations of inappropriate touching or physical contact by Jeremiah Mazo in 2015 or any time thereafter. It is further stipulated and agree that CCSD’s production of the same is contingent upon an Order from the Court allowing the disclosure of information in accordance with FERPA guidelines and that Plaintiffs and CCSD have agreed to jointly petition the Court for such an Order within seven (7) days from the Court’s approval of this Stipulation and Order. LV 420854811v1 Case 2:16-cv-00239-APG-PAL Document 32 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 2 1 IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT upon receipt, of the 2 information above, Plaintiffs shall dismiss all class action allegations with prejudice and shall agree not to 3 file a Motion for Class Certification. In the event the above conditions as outlined above cannot be 4 accomplished, for any reason whatsoever, Plaintiffs reserve the right to seek the names and contact 5 information of the subject minor students via other procedural means. 6 IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that as a result of the foregoing, 7 Plaintiffs’ deadline of Wednesday, January 25, 2017 to file a Motion for Class Certification shall be 8 extended and that should the conditions outlined above not be able to be satisfied for any reason 9 whatsoever, Plaintiffs shall be permitted to file a Motion for Class Certification within fourteen (14) days 10 from notification that the conditions herein cannot be satisfied and CCSD agrees not to object to the filing 11 of the Motion, but may oppose the Motion at CCSD’s discretion. 12 13 DATED this 25th day of January, 2017. DATED this 25th day of January, 2017. 14 EGLET PRINCE GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP. 15 /s/Artemus W. Ham ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3402 ARTEMUS W. HAM, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7001 AARON D. FORD, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7704 400 S. Seventh Street, Suite 400 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/Kara B. Hendricks MARK E. FERRARIO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 1625 KARA B. HENDRICKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7743 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 400 North Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Attorneys for Defendant Clark County School District 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 24th day of January, 2017. 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 LV 420854811v1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?