John Doe I, et al., v. Jeremiah Mazo, et al.,
Filing
36
ORDER Granting 32 Stipulation for CCSD to Produce Names of CCSD Students and to Extend Deadline for Motion for Class Certification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:16-cv-00239-APG-PAL Document 32 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 3402
ARTEMUS W. HAM, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7001
AARON D. FORD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7704
EGLET PRINCE
400 S. 7th Street, 4th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Tel.: (702) 450-5400
Fax: (702) 450-5451
E-Mail eservice@egletwall.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
JOHN and JANE DOE I, Guardians Ad Litem for
JOANN DOE I, a minor, individually and on behalf of
all those similarly situated, and JOHN and JANE DOE
II, Guardians Ad Litem for JOANN DOE II, a minor,
individually and on behalf of all those similarly
situated;
Plaintiffs,
15
16
17
18
19
CASE No.: 2:16-cv-00239-APG-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CCSD
TO PRODUCE NAMES OF CCSD
STUDENTS AND TO EXTEND
DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
vs.
JEREMIAH MAZO; CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL
DISTRICT; DOES 1 though 20; DOE 1 through 20;
ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through 20.
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between undersigned counsel for
Plaintiffs and undersigned counsel for Clark County School District (hereinafter “CCSD”) that CCSD
shall produce the names and most current contact information for the parents of all CCSD students who
contacted CCSD administration with allegations of inappropriate touching or physical contact by
Jeremiah Mazo in 2015 or any time thereafter. It is further stipulated and agree that CCSD’s production
of the same is contingent upon an Order from the Court allowing the disclosure of information in
accordance with FERPA guidelines and that Plaintiffs and CCSD have agreed to jointly petition the Court
for such an Order within seven (7) days from the Court’s approval of this Stipulation and Order.
LV 420854811v1
Case 2:16-cv-00239-APG-PAL Document 32 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 2
1
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT upon receipt, of the
2
information above, Plaintiffs shall dismiss all class action allegations with prejudice and shall agree not to
3
file a Motion for Class Certification. In the event the above conditions as outlined above cannot be
4
accomplished, for any reason whatsoever, Plaintiffs reserve the right to seek the names and contact
5
information of the subject minor students via other procedural means.
6
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that as a result of the foregoing,
7
Plaintiffs’ deadline of Wednesday, January 25, 2017 to file a Motion for Class Certification shall be
8
extended and that should the conditions outlined above not be able to be satisfied for any reason
9
whatsoever, Plaintiffs shall be permitted to file a Motion for Class Certification within fourteen (14) days
10
from notification that the conditions herein cannot be satisfied and CCSD agrees not to object to the filing
11
of the Motion, but may oppose the Motion at CCSD’s discretion.
12
13
DATED this 25th day of January, 2017.
DATED this 25th day of January, 2017.
14
EGLET PRINCE
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP.
15
/s/Artemus W. Ham
ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 3402
ARTEMUS W. HAM, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7001
AARON D. FORD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7704
400 S. Seventh Street, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
/s/Kara B. Hendricks
MARK E. FERRARIO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1625
KARA B. HENDRICKS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7743
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 400 North
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Attorneys for Defendant Clark County School
District
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 24th day of January, 2017.
25
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
LV 420854811v1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?