Patton et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 34

AMENDED ORDER. The Court's 32 Order is amended to reflect that plaintiffss 15 motion to amend the complaint was GRANTED and that plaintiffs' 7 motion to remand was DENIED as moot. This case remains remanded to state court. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/29/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - certified copy of docket sheet and Order mailed to State Court - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 CHARLENE PATTON and THOMAS H. PATTON, JR., AMENDED ORDER Plaintiff(s), 9 10 11 v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant(s). 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Case No. 2:16-CV-244 JCM (VCF) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), “[t]he court may correct a clerical mistake . . . whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with or without notice.” Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this court’s December 19, 2016, order is hereby amended to reflect that plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint (ECF No. 15) was GRANTED and that plaintiffs’ motion to remand (ECF No. 7) was DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case remains remanded to state court. DATED December 29, 2016 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?