Patton et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 34

AMENDED ORDER. The Court's 32 Order is amended to reflect that plaintiffss 15 motion to amend the complaint was GRANTED and that plaintiffs' 7 motion to remand was DENIED as moot. This case remains remanded to state court. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/29/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - certified copy of docket sheet and Order mailed to State Court - SLD)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7
8

CHARLENE PATTON and
THOMAS H. PATTON, JR.,

AMENDED ORDER
Plaintiff(s),

9
10
11

v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant(s).

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Case No. 2:16-CV-244 JCM (VCF)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), “[t]he court may correct a clerical
mistake . . . whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record. The court may
do so on motion or on its own, with or without notice.”
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this court’s December
19, 2016, order is hereby amended to reflect that plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint (ECF
No. 15) was GRANTED and that plaintiffs’ motion to remand (ECF No. 7) was DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case remains remanded to state court.
DATED December 29, 2016

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE