Cook v. Las Vegas NV Metropolitan Police Dept et al

Filing 22

ORDER accepting ECF No. 21 Report and Recommendation, dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 JAWVAN E. COOK, 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. 2:16-cv-00256-APG-CWH Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF. NO. 21) Defendant. On September 29, 2017, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered a report and recommendation that I dismiss this case with prejudice because plaintiff Jawvan Cook has ceased participating in the case and has not complied with the court’s orders. Cook did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). I nevertheless conducted a de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Judge Hoffman sets forth the proper legal analysis and factual basis for the decision. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Hoffman’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 21) is accepted. Plaintiff Jawvan Cook’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED this 21st day of November, 2017. 24 25 26 27 28 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?