Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Shenandoah Owners Association, Inc. et al
Filing
11
ORDER DENYING SFR's 10 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC,
5
2:16-cv-00268-JAD-NJK
Plaintiff
Order Denying Motion for Order
Directing Plaintiff to Post Cost Bond
6
v.
7
Shenandoah Owners Association, Inc., et al.,
[ECF 10]
8
Defendants
9
10
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC brings this action to avoid the effects of a 2012 HOA non-
11
judicial foreclosure sale of one of the properties in its mortgage portfolio. The purchaser of that
12
property at the foreclosure sale, defendant SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC, cites NRS 18.130(1)
13
and moves this court for an order directing Nationstar to “post a $500 cost bond within 30 days”
14
and staying these proceedings until that bond is posted.1 I deny the motion because the stay in
15
NRS 18.130(1) is self executing and because it does not appear that SFR has properly invoked
16
this statute.
17
Discussion
18
NRS 18.130(1) allows a defendant to require an out-of-state plaintiff to post security for
19
“the costs and charges” that “may be awarded against” it.2 To trigger this obligation, the
20
defendant must file and serve on the plaintiff “a written demand therefor within the time limited
21
for answering the complaint.”3 When a proper demand is made, NRS 18.130(1) imposes an
22
automatic stay on “all proceedings in the action” until the plaintiff posts a bond for—or deposits
23
24
25
1
ECF 10 at 2.
2
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 18.130(1).
3
Id.
26
27
1
cash in the amount of—$500.4 Once the plaintiff posts the security, it must “notify the
2
defendant,” and the defendant then has 10 days to respond to the complaint.5 If the plaintiff fails
3
to post the demanded security within 30 days of the notice, “the court or judge may order the
4
action to be dismissed.”6
5
NRS 18.130 does not require a court order to compel an out-of-state plaintiff to post a
6
cost bond; it requires the defendant to send a written demand for the bond before its answer to
7
the complaint is due, and that demand triggers the process.7 This process happens without action
8
by the court. If the 30 days elapse without the plaintiff posting the bond or cash, only then “may
9
the court or judge” take action.8
10
So, not only does SFR not need an order from this court at this time, it does not appear
11
from this motion that SFR has done what is required to trigger Nationstar’s obligations under
12
NRS 18.130 or the stay it affords: send a timely written demand to Nationstar.
13
Conclusion
14
15
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SFR’s Motion for Security of Costs
[ECF 10] is DENIED.
16
Dated March 3, 2016
17
_______________________________
_____________________
_
_
_
_
Jennifer A. Dorsey
er A. Dorsey
r
United States District Judge
d
District Judge
d
18
19
20
21
22
23
4
Id.
5
Id.
6
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 18.130(4).
7
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 18.130(1).
8
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 18.130(4).
24
25
26
27
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?