Interface Operations LLC v. Kwame Luangisa

Filing 59

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 51 plaintiff's motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the instant matter Interface Operations LLC v. Kwame Luangisa, case number 2 :16-cv-00280-JCM-CWH, be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 51 defendant's motion for attorney's fees be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 38 defendant's motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. See Order for details. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 INTERFACE OPERATIONS LLC, 8 9 10 Case No. 2:16-CV-280 JCM (CWH) Plaintiff(s), ORDER v. KWAME LUANGISA, 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 Presently before the court is plaintiff Interface Operations LLC’s motion to dismiss. (ECF 14 No. 51). Defendant Kwame Luangisa filed a response (ECF No. 52), to which plaintiff replied 15 (ECF No. 55). 16 17 18 19 Also before the court is defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 53). Plaintiff filed a response (ECF No. 56), to which defendant replied (ECF No. 58). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) governs voluntary dismissal of actions and provides as follows: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge (1) By the Plaintiff. (A) Without a Court Order. Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1(c), 23.2, and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. (B) Effect. Unless the notice or stipulation states otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice. But if the plaintiff previously dismissed any federalor state-court action based on or including the same claim, a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (2) By Court Order; Effect. Except as provided in Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper. If a defendant has pleaded a counterclaim before being served with the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss, the action may be dismissed over the defendant’s objection only if the counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication. Unless the order states otherwise, a dismissal under this paragraph (2) is without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). In the instant motion, plaintiff moves to voluntarily dismiss the instant action with prejudice. (ECF No. 51). Defendant does not oppose dismissing the action with prejudice (ECF No. 52), but requests leave to submit a memorandum of attorney’s fees (ECF No. 53). 9 In light of the foregoing, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the instant action 10 with prejudice. The court will deny defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees as it does not comply 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 with Local Rule 54-16(b)’s requirements for motions for attorney’s fees. See LR 54-16(b). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 51) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the instant matter Interface Operations LLC v. Kwame Luangisa, case number 2:16-cv-00280-JCM-CWH, be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees (ECF No. 53) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice to his ability to resubmit a motion that complies with the federal and local rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 38) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. DATED March 22, 2017. 24 25 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?