Lee et al v. Marten Transport, Ltd. et al
Filing
70
ORDER denying as moot 55 Motion for Summary Judgment.; denying as moot 57 Motion for Summary Judgment.; granting 65 Motion for Leave to File.; Motions for Summary Judgment due by 5/15/2017. Plaintiffs shall have 21 days from the date of refiling to respond to the motions, and Defendants shall have 14 days thereafter to file replies. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/9/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
STEVEN C. LEE, et al.,
4
Plaintiffs,
5
vs.
6
MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD., et al.,
7
Defendants.
8
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00282-GMN-CWH
ORDER
9
On March 14, 2017, Defendants Marten Transport, Ltd. and Louis M. Plascencia
10
11
(collectively “Defendants”) filed motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ claims for
12
punitive damages. (ECF Nos. 55, 57). Both of these motions exceeded the page limits set forth
13
in Local Rule 7-3.
On April 4, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to allow Defendants to refile both
14
15
motions in accordance with the required page limits, which the Court granted. Thereafter,
16
Defendants filed a Motion for Leave to Refile the motions for summary judgment and attached
17
the two revised motions as exhibits. (ECF No. 65).
18
In light of the parties’ prior stipulation, and for good cause appearing,
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Refile is
20
GRANTED. The Defendants shall have until May 15, 2017, to refile the respective motions
21
for summary judgment on the docket. Plaintiffs Steven C. Lee and Ardi Ly shall have 21 days
22
from the date of refiling to respond to the motions, and Defendants shall have 14 days
23
thereafter to file replies.
24
///
25
///
Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motions for summary Judgment, (ECF
Nos. 55, 57), are DENIED as moot.
DATED this _____ day of May, 2017.
9
4
5
6
7
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?