Astrabrands L.V. Inc. v. Global Expo Tranz LLC et al

Filing 55

MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE - Conference call held on 9/13/2016 before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Judicial Assistant: Teresa Hoskin; Pla Counsel: Pamela McKay; Def Counsel for Global Expo Tranz, LLC: Michael Ernst; De f Counsel for New England Motor Freight, Inc.: Steven Abbott; Def Counsel for RR Donnelley Logistics Worldwide, Inc.: Anthony Wong; Counsel for Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc.: David Koch, Paul Graves; Court Reporter/FTR #: None; Time of Hearing: 2:05 p.m. - 2:18 p.m.; The 51 , 52 , and 54 Motions for Leave to Appear Telephonically at Settlement Conference are Denied. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
    1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 ASTRABRANDS LV, INC., Case No. 2:16-cv-00302-JCM-PAL 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 GLOBAL EXPO TRANZ, LLC, et al, Dated: September 13, 2016 Defendants. 8 9 MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE v. PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PEGGY A. LEEN, United States Magistrate Judge 10 JUDICIAL ASSISTANT: Teresa Hoskin 11 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Pamela McKay 12 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT GLOBAL EXPO TRANZ, LLC: Michael Ernst 13 COUNSEL 14 Steven Abbott 15 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT RR DONNELLEY LOGISTICS WORLDWIDE, INC.: 16 Anthony Wong 17 COUNSEL FOR OAK HARBOR FREIGHT LINES, INC.: David Koch, Paul Graves 18 PROCEEDING: Conference call FOR DEFENDANT RECORDER/TAPE #: None NEW ENGLAND MOTOR FREIGHT, INC.: 19 A conference call was conducted commencing at 2:05 p.m. regarding the parties’ 20 Motions for Leave to Appear Telephonically at Settlement Conference (ECF Nos. 51, 52, 54). 21 After conferring with counsel, the requests will be denied. The settlement conference concluded 22 at 2:18 p.m. 23 24 IT IS ORDERED that the Motions for Leave to Appear Telephonically at Settlement Conference (ECF Nos. 51, 52, 54) are DENIED. 25 26 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27   28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?