Mehudar v. Acklin, et al

Filing 85

ORDER that within 21 days from the date of this order the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11

HEATHER MEHUDAR,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GENEVIE ACKLIN, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:16-cv-00304-RFB-CWH
ORDER

12
13

In reviewing the docket in this case, it has come to the court’s attention that the parties have

14

not filed a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires that the “pro

15

se plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney must initiate the scheduling of the conference required by Fed. R.

16

Civ. P. 26(f) to be held within 30 days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears.

17

Fourteen days after the mandatory Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, the parties must submit a

18

stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order.” Here, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (ECF

19

No. 4) on February 29, 2016. To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan and

20

scheduling order.

21
22

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within 21 days from the date of this order, the parties
must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.

23
24

DATED: June 27, 2017

25
26
27
28

______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge