Mehudar v. Acklin, et al
ORDER that within 21 days from the date of this order the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
GENEVIE ACKLIN, et al.,
Case No. 2:16-cv-00304-RFB-CWH
In reviewing the docket in this case, it has come to the court’s attention that the parties have
not filed a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires that the “pro
se plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney must initiate the scheduling of the conference required by Fed. R.
Civ. P. 26(f) to be held within 30 days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears.
Fourteen days after the mandatory Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, the parties must submit a
stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order.” Here, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (ECF
No. 4) on February 29, 2016. To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan and
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within 21 days from the date of this order, the parties
must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.
DATED: June 27, 2017
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?