Oliver v. Bell Trans et al
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 36 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 29 Motion (Second Request). See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Case 2:16-cv-00305-JAD-PAL Document 36 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Anthony L. Hall, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 5977
ahall@hollandhart.com
Peter D. Navarro, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10168
pdnavarro@hollandhart.com
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
(702) 669-4600
(702) 669-4650 – fax
Attorneys for Defendants
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Phone: (702) 669-4600 ♦ Fax: (702) 669-4650
10
CAMERON E. OLIVER, individually and on
11 behalf of others similarly situated,
12
Plaintiff,
13 v.
CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-00305-JAD-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER
(SECOND REQUEST)
14 BELL TRANS, a Nevada Corporation, and
BRENT J. BELL,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Defendants Bell Trans and Brent J. Bell (collectively, “Bell Trans” or “Defendants”), and
18
Plaintiff Cameron E. Oliver, (“Plaintiff”), through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to a two
19
day extension of time for Defendants: (1) to file a response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Circulation of
20
Notice of the Pendency of this Action Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(B) and for Other Relief
21
(“Motion”) (ECF No. 29); or (2) to file a motion with the Court requesting that the deadline for the
22
response to the Motion be extended until June 19, 2017. Pursuant to the above, Defendants’ response
23
to the Motion, currently due May 31, 2017, would now be due on June 2, 2017.
24
This is the second request for an extension of this deadline and Defendants submit the request
25
is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. The prior requested extension was, as
26
previously explained by Defendants to the Court, sought by the Defendants to accommodate the
27
work schedule for Defendants’ counsel and because the parties were concurrently in the process of
28
analyzing voluminous amounts of data in preparation for a joint mediation involving this matter and
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:16-cv-00305-JAD-PAL Document 36 Filed 05/31/17 Page 2 of 2
1
a related class/collective action matter that is also presently before this Court, Case No. 2:15-cv-
2
01066-MMD-PAL, Willie Thurmond v. Presidential Limousine. Attendance at the mediation has
3
been confirmed by all parties and is scheduled to take place on June 9, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. before the
4
Hon. Stewart L. Bell (Ret). Defendants represent that the instant request is to provide Defendants
5
with the opportunity to move for additional time to respond to the Motion so as to allow them to
6
focus resources on the June 9, 2017, mediation and to forego additional litigation costs pending the
7
conclusion of that mediation.
8
DATED this 31st day of May, 2017.
9
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Phone: (702) 669-4600 ♦ Fax: (702) 669-4650
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
BY: /s/ Leon Greenberg, Esq.
LEON GREENBERG, ESQ.
NV Bar No. 8094
leongreenberg@overtimelaw.com
DANA SNIEGOCKI, ESQ.
NV Bar No. 11715
dana@overtimelaw.com
LEON GREENBERG PROFESSIONAL
CORPORATION
2965 South Jones Blvd – Suite E3
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Attorneys for Defendants
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
17
18
BY: /s/ Peter D. Navarro, Esq.
ANTHONY L. HALL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5977
ahall@hollandhart.com
PETER D. NAVARRO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10168
pdnavarro@hollandhart.com
HOLLAND & HART LLP
5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor
Reno, Nevada 89511
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
6/1/2017
Dated: __________________, 2017.
_______________________________________
United States District Judge
21
22
HOLLAND & HART LLP
23
24
25
26
By: /s/ Peter D. Navarro, Esq.
ANTHONY L. HALL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5977
PETER D. NAVARRO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10168
HOLLAND & HART LLP
27
28
Attorneys for Defendants
9884335_1
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?