Nike, Inc. v. Fujian Bestwinn (China) Industry Co., Ltd.

Filing 36

ORDER that 35 Motion to Seal is GRANTED in part. The current documents (ECF Nos. 33 and 34 ) shall remain sealed. The plaintiff shall file redacted versions of those documents, redacting only the references to the hourly rates and the billed amounts for each specific work entry in the declarations and exhibits. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 NIKE, INC., 5 6 7 8 9 Case No. 2:16-cv-00311-APG-VCF Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL v. FUJIAN BESTWINN (CHINA) INDUSTRY CO. LTD a/k/a XIAMEN BESTWINN IMP. & EXP. CO. LTD., (ECF NO. 35) Defendant. 10 11 The plaintiff seeks to seal the declarations of Aaron Bowling and Jonathan Fountain and 12 the exhibits attached to them. ECF No. 35. The declarations do not appear to contain any 13 confidential information, other than the hourly rates charged. Typically, attorneys’ hourly rates 14 and the work they perform are not considered confidential, especially in a request for 15 reimbursement of such fees. Indeed, if the rates and work are not disclosed, the opposing party 16 has no ability to object to the reasonableness of the fees charged. However, given the unique 17 circumstances of this case, I will allow the plaintiffs to seal the references to the hourly rates that 18 are contained in the declarations and exhibits, and the billed dollar amounts for each specific 19 work entry. The descriptions of the work performed are generic and do not appear to disclose any 20 confidential information or privileged communications. Nor are the number of hours charged 21 confidential. Thus, that portion of the plaintiff’s motion is denied. 22 IT IS ORDERED that the motion to seal (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED IN PART. The 23 current documents (ECF Nos. 33 and 34) shall remain sealed. The plaintiff shall file redacted 24 versions of those documents, redacting only the references to the hourly rates and the billed 25 amounts for each specific work entry in the declarations and exhibits. 26 27 28 Dated: October 6, 2016. ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?