Bank of New York Mellon, v. Imagination North Landscape Maintenance Association, et al

Filing 163

ORDER that ECF No. 159 Motion to Remove Attorney from Electronic Service List is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Case No.: 2:16-cv-00383-MMD-NJK Plaintiff(s), 9 Order v. 10 11 12 13 [Docket No. 159] IMAGINATION NORTH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendant(s). Pending before the Court is a motion to be removed from the CM/ECF service list filed by 14 counsel for the trustee of the Alessi & Koenig bankruptcy estate. Docket No. 159. The motion 15 indicates that the trustee will not be participating in this case and that appropriate action may be 16 pursued against Alessi & Koenig. See id. at 2. No legal authority or meaningfully developed 17 argument is provided that such circumstances justify removal of an attorney from the CM/ECF 18 service list. Moreover, there could be advantages to not taking such action, including providing 19 notice and service of future filings through the CM/ECF system. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) (“If 20 the party against whom a default judgment is sought has appeared personally or by a representative, 21 that party or its representative must be served with written notice of the application [for default 22 judgment] at least 7 days before the hearing”); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E) (allowing for 23 service through electronic court filing systems). Having been provided no explanation why 24 removal from the CM/ECF list is appropriate, the instant motion is DENIED without prejudice. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: August 7, 2019 27 ______________________________ Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?