Stipp v. Julie F. Beasley, Ph.D., Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation. Discovery Plan due by 8/16/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

LAW OFFICE OF MITCHELL STIPP
MITCHELL STIPP, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7531
10161 Park Run Drive
Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 866.220.5332
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10

AMY STIPP, an individual, and as the mother
of MITCHELL STIPP, JR., a minor child,
Plaintiffs,

11
12
13
14

Case No. 2:16-CV-00395

vs.
DR. JULIE F. BEASLEY, an individual, and
JULIE F. BEASLEY, PH.D., INC., a Nevada
corporation,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
FOR FILING OF DISCOVERY PLAN
(First Request)

Defendants.

15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff, Amy Stipp, an individual, and as mother of Mitchell Stipp, Jr., her minor child

20

(“Plaintiff”), by and through their attorney, Mitchell D. Stipp, Esq., of the LAW OFFICE OF

21
22
23
24

MITCHELL STIPP, and Dr. Julie F. Beasley, an individual, and Julie F. Beasley, Ph.D., Inc., a
Nevada corporation (“Defendant”), by and through their attorney, Kathryn L. Butler, Esq., of
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, agree and stipulate as follows:

25

1.

Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 28, 2016 (Dkt. No. 5).

26

2.

Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss on April 14, 2016

27
28

(Dkt. No. 6).
Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

3.

Defendant filed a Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss on April

25, 2016 (Dkt. No. 8).
4.

Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike Defendant’s Reply to Opposition to Motion to

Dismiss on April 26, 2016 (Dkt. No. 9). Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike
is due on or before May 13, 2016.
5.

The court filed a Transfer Order on April 27, 2016 (Dkt. No. 10). This order

8

transferred case entitled, “Amy Stipp v. Cole et al.,” Case No. 2:16-cv-00396 (“Stipp v. Cole”),

9

to Judge Gloria Navarro (“Judge Navarro”) from Judge Jennifer Dorsey.

10
11
12
13

6.

Judge Navarro filed a Minute Order on April 28, 2016 requesting briefing by

parties to show cause as to why this case should not be consolidated with Stipp v. Cole. The
briefing on the issue of consolidation is due on or before May 19, 2016.

14

7.

The Discovery Plan in this case is due on May 12, 2016.

15

8.

The parties desire to have the motion to dismiss and issue of consolidation

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

resolved before filing a Discovery Plan. Therefore, the parties agree to extend the time for the
filing of a Discovery Plan to a new date as determined by the court.
Dated this 12th day of May, 2016
LAW OFFICE OF MITCHELL STIPP

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

/s/ Mitchell Stipp
_______________________________
Mitchell Stipp, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7531
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Counsel for Plaintiffs

/s/ Kathryn L. Butler
_____________________________
S. Brent Vogel, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6858
Kathryn L. Butler, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9464
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Counsel for Defendants

26
27
28

Page 2 of 3

1
2
ORDER

3
4

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the deadline

5

for the parties to file a discovery plan in this matter shall be extended to the 16th day of

6

August, 2016.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of May, 2016.

8
9
10

________________________________
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 3 of 3