Botezatu v. Las Vegas Limousines, LLC

Filing 5

ORDER that Plaintiff shall file his Certificate of Interested Parties by 4/22/2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/8/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EW)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 EMIL BOTEZATU, 8 9 10 Case No. 2:16-cv-00397-RFB-PAL Plaintiff, ORDER v. LAS VEGAS LIMOUSINES, LLC, Defendant. 11 12 This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested 13 Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (Dkt. #1) in this matter was filed February 25, 14 2016. No answer has been filed. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases 15 (except habeas corpus cases) counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in 16 the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, 17 firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, 18 pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no 19 known interested parties other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must 20 be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification 21 upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date, Plaintiff has failed to 22 comply. Accordingly, 23 IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff shall his certificate of interested parties, which fully complies 24 with LR 7.1-1 no later than April 22, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an 25 order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. 26 DATED this 8th day of April, 2016. 27 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?