Basin and Range Watch v. Bureau Of Land Management et al

Filing 37

ORDER Granting 36 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 32 MOTION to Reopen Discovery.( Responses due by 1/23/2017., Replies due by 2/8/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00403-JCM-PAL Document 36 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 2 1 DAVID H. BECKER, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) Oregon Bar No. 081507 2 Law Office of David H. Becker, LLC 917 SW Oak St., Suite 409 3 Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 388-9160 4 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney District of Nevada TROY K. FLAKE Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney’s Office 501 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: 702-388-6336 Facsimile: 702-388-6787 Email: 5 DAVID A. BAHR, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) Oregon Bar No. 90199 6 Bahr Law Offices, P.C. 1035 1/2 Monroe St. 7 Eugene, Oregon 97402 (541) 556-6439 8 Attorneys for the Federal Defendants 9 WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP 10 CHRISTOPHER W. MIXSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10685 11 5594-B Longley Lane Reno, Nevada 89511 12 (775) 853-6787/Fax: (775) 853-6774 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff Basin and Range Watch 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 16 17 BASIN AND RANGE WATCH, Plaintiff, 18 19 v. 21 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 22 Defendants. 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.: 2:16-cv-00403 JCM-PAL STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY (SECOND REQUEST) 23 24 Plaintiff Basin and Rage Watch and Defendants Bureau of Land Management and U.S. 25 Department of the Interior filed a Motion to Reopen Discovery (ECF# 32) on December 9, 2016. On 26 December 15, 2016, the Court granted the parties’ first request for extension of the briefing deadlines Case 2:16-cv-00403-JCM-PAL Document 36 Filed 01/09/17 Page 2 of 2 1 (ECF #35). The current deadlines call for the United States’ response on January 9, 2017, and 2 Plaintiff’s reply on January 23, 2017. 3 The parties have engaged in substantive discussions to resolve the matters at issue in the Motion 4 to Reopen Discovery. Both parties are hopeful that they will be able to reach an agreement that will 5 obviate the need for further briefing on this Motion. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court 6 permit them to modify the briefing schedule as follows: 7 January 23, 2017 – United States Opposition to the Motion to Reopen Discovery 8 February 8, 2017 – Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion to Reopen Discovery 9 The extension requested is not for purposes of delay and is sought in good faith. This will give 10 the parties sufficient time to work toward a resolution of the matters at issue in this motion, including 11 obtaining client approval and crafting an appropriate stipulation. In the event that the parties are unable 12 to resolve the issue without going forward on the Motion, this schedule will allow them to fully brief the 13 issues and file their responses. 14 Respectfully submitted this 9th day of January 2017. 15 DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney 16 17 /s/ Troy K. Flake Troy K. Flake 18 Assistant United States Attorney Of Attorneys for Federal Defendants 19 /s/ David H. Becker David H. Becker, Esq., Pro Hac Vice Of Attorneys for Plaintiff It is so ordered. 20 21 Date: January 10, 2017 United States Magistrate Judge 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?