Miyayama v. Ditech Financial LLC, et al

Filing 33

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that within 21 days from the date of this order, the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/27/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11

YUICHI MIYAYAMA,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:16-cv-00413-JAD-CWH
ORDER

12
13

In reviewing the docket in this case, it has come to the court’s attention that the parties have

14

not filed a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Local Rule 26-1(a) requires that the

15

“plaintiff’s attorney must initiate the scheduling of the conference required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)

16

to be held within 30 days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears. Fourteen days

17

after the mandatory Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, the parties must submit a stipulated discovery

18

plan and scheduling order.” Here, Defendant Ditech Financial LLC filed a motion to dismiss (ECF

19

No. 10) on March 29, 2016. Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation filed a joinder (ECF No.

20

17) to the motion on April 25, 2016. To date, the parties have not filed a stipulated discovery plan

21

and scheduling order.

22
23

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within 21 days from the date of this order, the parties
must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.

24
25

DATED: October 27, 2016

26
27
28

______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge