Bank of New York Mellon v. Castle Bay Shore Village of Los Prados Homeowners Association et al
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 40 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 38 MOTION to Extend Time regarding discovery deadlines.( Responses due by 12/12/2016., Replies due by 12/23/2016.) Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/22/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-00416-JCM-GWF Document 40 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JORGE A. RAMIREZ, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6787
I-CHE LAI, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12247
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: 702.727.1400
Facsimile: 702.727.1401
Jorge.Ramirez@wilsonelser.com
I-Che.Lai@wilsonelser.com
Attorneys for Castle Bay Shore Village of
Los Prados Homeowners Association,
also known as Castle Bay Shore Community Association, Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
12
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA
THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE
FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF
CWABS INC., ASSET-BACKED
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-3,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
vs.
CASTLE BAY SHORE VILLAGE OF LOS
PRADOS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
A/K/A CASTLE BAY SHORE
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC et al.,
Case No. 2:16-cv-00416-JCM-GWF
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT
RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND
AMENDMENT DEADLINE, DISCOVERY
DEADLINE, DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
DEADLINE AND PRETRIAL ORDER
DEADLINE
(First Request)
17
18
Defendants.
AND RELATED CLAIMS
19
Pursuant to LR 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff The Bank of New York Mellon (“BONYM”), formerly
20
known as The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS Inc., Asset-
21
Backed Certificates, Series 2005-3, and Defendant Castle Bay Shore Village of Los Prados
22
Homeowners Association (the “HOA”), also known as Castle Bay Shore Community Association,
23
Inc., hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for the HOA to respond to BONYM’s Motion to Extend
24
Amendment Deadline, Discovery Deadline, Dispositive Motions Deadline and Pretrial Order
1
1077412v.1
Case 2:16-cv-00416-JCM-GWF Document 40 Filed 11/21/16 Page 2 of 2
1
Deadline (“Motion to Extend”), filed on November 2, 2016 as ECF No. 38. This is the first request
2
for an extension of time for the HOA to file a response brief.
3
The current deadline for the parties to file response briefs to the Motion to Extend is
4
November 21, 2016. BONYM and the HOA have stipulated to a twenty-one day extension for the
5
HOA to file a response brief to the Motion to Extend, such that the deadline for filing the response
6
will be December 12, 2016. The undersigned parties further stipulate and agree that BONYM’s reply
7
brief in support of the Motion to Extend will be due December 23, 2016.
8
The HOA has requested additional time to file its response brief, given that the parties are
9
currently in global settlement discussions, and the parties should know the result of such discussions
10
by December 12, 2016. Settlement will resolve this case, thereby rendering BONYM’s Motion to
11
Extend moot. Thus, the undersigned parties respectfully suggest that a twenty-one day extension is
12
reasonable and that a good faith position exists for this Court to grant the stipulation of the parties.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DATED this 21st day of November, 2016.
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN &
DICKER LLP
AKERMAN LLP
/s/ I-Che Lai
JORGE A. RAMIREZ, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6787
I-CHE LAI, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12247
300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
/s/ Tenesa Scaturro
MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8215
TENESA S. SCATURRO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12488
1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Attorneys for Defendant Castle Bay Shore Village Attorneys for Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A.
of Los Prados Homeowners Association
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
November 22, 2016
DATED: _________________________________
2
1077412v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?