2-Way Computing, Inc. v. Shoretel, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER Granting 21 Unopposed Motion.; re 1 Complaint. Shoretel, Inc. answer due 6/14/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Case 2:16-cv-00420-GMN-CWH Document 21 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Reza Mirzaie, Esq.
(Pro Hac Vice to be submitted)
[e-mail]
Stanley H. Thompson, Jr., Esq.
(Pro Hac Vice to be submitted)
[e-mail]
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Mark Borghese, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6231
[e-mail]
BORGHESE LEGAL, LTD.
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
T: [phone]
F: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

14
15

2-WAY COMPUTING, INC., a Nevada
corporation,

16

v.

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,

SHORETEL, INC., a Delaware corporation,

19

Defendant.

20

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00420-GMN-CWH
UNOPPOSED MOTION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(SECOND REQUEST)

21

Plaintiff 2-Way Computing, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) hereby files this Unopposed Motion and

22

[Proposed] Order to Extend Deadline for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint in accordance

23

with LR IA 6-1 and LR IA 6-2. This is the second request to extend the proposed deadline. This

24

request is not made after the response deadline which is currently May 15, 2016.

25

The Complaint (Doc. 1) was filed on February 29, 2016 and was served on ShoreTel, Inc.

26

on or about March 25, 2016. A first extension to respond to the complaint was granted until May

27

15, 2016.

28

///

BORGHESE LEGAL, LTD.
10161 PARK RUN DRIVE,
SUITE 150
LAS VEGAS,
NEVADA 89145
[phone]

2016-05-10-Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time.docx

1

Case 2:16-cv-00420-GMN-CWH Document 21 Filed 05/10/16 Page 2 of 3

1

Plaintiff is currently in the process of finalizing an agreement which will resolve the claims

2

in this litigation against Defendant. Plaintiff believes this agreement will be executed in the next

3

few weeks and thereafter this case can be dismissed

4

The parties believe that the litigation of this matter will be best served by allowing an

5

additional thirty (30) days to work on a resolution of this matter. Because an attorney for

6

Defendant has not made an appearance in this case, Plaintiff files this motion to extend

7

Defendant’s deadline as an unopposed motion.

8
9

Accordingly, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant its request to continue the
deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint until June 14, 2016.

10
11

BORGHESE LEGAL, LTD.

12
13

/s/ Mark Borghese

DATED: May 10, 2016.

Mark Borghese, Esq.
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145

14
15

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
Reza Mirzaie, Esq.
Stanley H. Thompson, Jr., Esq.
12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90025
Attorneys for Plaintiff

16
17
18
19

ORDER

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED:

May 12, 2016

26
27
28
BORGHESE LEGAL, LTD.
10161 PARK RUN DRIVE,
SUITE 150
LAS VEGAS,
NEVADA 89145
[phone]

2016-05-10-Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time.docx

2

Case 2:16-cv-00420-GMN-CWH Document 21 Filed 05/10/16 Page 3 of 3

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2
3
4

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing document has been
served on May 10, 2016 to all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system.

5
6

Dated: May 10, 2016

/s/ Mark Borghese

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BORGHESE LEGAL, LTD.
10161 PARK RUN DRIVE,
SUITE 150
LAS VEGAS,
NEVADA 89145
[phone]

2016-05-10-Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time.docx

3