Bank of America, N.A. v. Skyridge Homeowners Association et al
Filing
28
ORDER that 27 Motion for Service by Publication is GRANTED. The deadline to serve Defendant by publication is also extended by 60 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/1/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
SKYRIDGE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-00436-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 27)
16
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to serve Defendant Liqun
17
Holdings Limited (“Defendant”), and for leave to serve it by publication. Docket No. 27. The Court
18
finds the motion properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed
19
below, the motion is GRANTED.
20
I.
Motion to Extend Time for Service
21
Where good cause is shown, the time for serving the complaint is extended for an appropriate
22
period. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The motion establishes sufficient cause to extend the time for
23
effectuating service on Defendant for 60 days.
24
II.
Motion for Leave to Serve by Publication
25
Plaintiff seeks leave to serve Defendant by publication. Service by publication implicates a
26
defendant’s fundamental due process rights. See, e.g., Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.,
27
339 U.S. 306, 314-15 (1950); Price v. Dunn, 787 P.2d 785, 787 (Nev. 1990). As a result, service by
28
publication is generally disfavored. See, e.g., Trustees of the Nev. Resort Assoc.–Int’l Alliance of
1
Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Picture Machine Operators v. Alumifax, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist.
2
Lexis. 106456, *2 (D. Nev. July 29, 2013).
3
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for service pursuant to the law of the state in which
4
the district court is located, or in which service is made. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Pursuant to
5
Rule 4 of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, parties are generally required to personally serve
6
summons and the complaint upon defendants. Nevada law also permits a party to obtain leave for
7
service by publication when the opposing party, inter alia “cannot, after due diligence be found within
8
the state, or by concealment seeks to avoid the service of summons.” Nev. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). There are
9
several factors courts consider to evaluate a party’s due diligence, including the number of attempts
10
made to serve the defendant at his residence and other methods of locating defendants, such as
11
consulting public directories and family members. See Price, 787 P.2d at 786-87; Abreu v. Gilmer, 985
12
P.2d 746, 747 (Nev. 1999); McNair v. Rivera, 874 P.2d 1240, 1241 (Nev. 1994).
13
Here, Plaintiff’s efforts to effectuate service consist of (1) attempting to personally serve the
14
Defendant’s president (Zhiqun Huang) at two locations identified on the Secretary of State website and
15
(2) attempting to serve Defendant through its previous attorney; (3) conducting a skip trace on various
16
officers of Liqun; and (4) attempting to serve on such officer four times at a home address located. See
17
Docket No. 27 at 3-4. The Court finds these efforts sufficient to establish diligence, and permits service
18
by publication.
19
//
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
2
1
III.
Conclusion
2
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion for service by publication. The deadline to serve
3
Defendant by publication is also extended by 60 days. Plaintiff shall comply with the requirements of
4
Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and shall:
5
(a)
6
7
Serve Defendants by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the
State of Nevada on a weekly basis for a period of four weeks.
(b)
After publication is complete, Plaintiff shall file an Affidavit of Publication.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
DATED: August 1, 2016
10
11
12
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?