Torres v. Neven et al

Filing 62

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 59 petitioners motion for voluntary dismissal is granted, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 *** 11 ANGEL TORRES, 12 13 14 Case No. 2:16-cv-00443-GMN-CWH Petitioner, v. ORDER DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., Respondents. 15 16 This pro se habeas matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s motion to withdraw his 17 petition (ECF No. 59). The Court construes the motion as a motion for voluntary dismissal. 18 Respondents do not oppose. (ECF No. 61). Petitioner has not filed a reply, and the time for doing 19 so has expired. 20 Once the respondent has filed an answer, as respondents have done in this case, a petitioner 21 may voluntarily dismiss his petition only by stipulation of the parties or pursuant to an order of the 22 court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Because respondents have not opposed petitioner’s voluntary 23 dismissal and because it is clear from the motion that petitioner understands there are potential 24 legal consequences that may arise from dismissing his petition, the Court sees no reason to deny 25 petitioner’s request. Accordingly, petitioner’s motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 59) will 26 be granted. 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 In accordance with the foregoing, petitioner’s motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 59) is granted, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case is dismissed. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 DATED THIS ____ day of February 2019. _________, 8 GLORIA M. NAVARRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?