Torres v. Neven et al
Filing
62
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 59 petitioners motion for voluntary dismissal is granted, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
***
11
ANGEL TORRES,
12
13
14
Case No. 2:16-cv-00443-GMN-CWH
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
Respondents.
15
16
This pro se habeas matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s motion to withdraw his
17
petition (ECF No. 59). The Court construes the motion as a motion for voluntary dismissal.
18
Respondents do not oppose. (ECF No. 61). Petitioner has not filed a reply, and the time for doing
19
so has expired.
20
Once the respondent has filed an answer, as respondents have done in this case, a petitioner
21
may voluntarily dismiss his petition only by stipulation of the parties or pursuant to an order of the
22
court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Because respondents have not opposed petitioner’s voluntary
23
dismissal and because it is clear from the motion that petitioner understands there are potential
24
legal consequences that may arise from dismissing his petition, the Court sees no reason to deny
25
petitioner’s request. Accordingly, petitioner’s motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 59) will
26
be granted.
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
In accordance with the foregoing, petitioner’s motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 59)
is granted, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case is dismissed.
It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly and close
this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
DATED THIS ____ day of February 2019.
_________,
8
GLORIA M. NAVARRO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?