Microsoft Corporation v. Pak et al
Filing
36
ORDER Granting 35 Stipulation Continuing Settlement Conference. ( Settlement Conference reset for 2/3/2017 01:00 PM before Judge Nancy J. Koppe.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/5/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:16-cv-00452-GMN-VCF Document 35 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 3
1 JOHN K. GALLAGHER, ESQ. (SBN. 0956)
GUILD, GALLAGHER & FULLER, LTD.
2 100 West Liberty St., Suite 800
P.O. Box 2838
3 Reno, Nevada 89501
Telephone: 775.786.2366
4 Facsimile: 775.322.9105
jgallagher@ggfltd.com
5
AUDRA M. MORI, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice)
6 PERKINS COIE LLP
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700
7 Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: 310.788.9900
8 Facsimile: 310.788.3399
AMori@perkinscoie.com
9 Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
10
WHITNEY C. WILCHER, ESQ. (SBN. 7212)
11 THE WILCHER FIRM
8465 West Sahara Ave., Suite 111-236
12 Las Vegas, NV 89117
Telephone: 702.528.5201
13 Facsimile: 702.979.4121
wcwilcher@hotmail.com
14
ERIC J. MENHART, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice)
15 LEXERO LAW
316 F Street, Suite 101
16 Washington, DC 20002
Telephone: 855.453.9376
17 Facsimile: 855.453.9376
Eric.Menhart@Lexero.com
18 Attorneys for Defendants
JULIANNA PAK and MARK PAK
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
21
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
) Case No. 2:16-cv-00452-GMN-VCF
22
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
23
) ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT
v.
) CONFERENCE
24
)
JULIANNA PAK, an individual d/b/a
)
25 IBENEVOLO and IBENEVOLO.COM;
) (First Request by Stipulation and
JULIANNA PAK, an individual; and MARK ) Proposed Order to Continue Date of
26 PAK, an individual,
) Conference)
)
27
Defendants.
)
)
28
134053056.1
Case 2:16-cv-00452-GMN-VCF Document 35 Filed 01/04/17 Page 2 of 3
1
Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) by and through its undersigned counsel of
2 record, and Defendants Julianna Pak, an individual doing business as ibenevolo and
3
4
5
ibenevolo.com; Julianna Pak, an individual; and Mark Pak, an individual (collectively
“Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:
1.
6
A settlement conference took place on October 19, 2016. A continued telephonic
7 settlement conference took place on December 5, 2016, and a further in-person settlement
8 conference is set to take place on January 6, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.
9
10
11
12
2.
execute settlement documents. Therefore, the parties request that the settlement conference set for
January 6, 2017, be continued for approximately two weeks, until the week of January 23, 2017.
3.
13
14
Today the parties agreed to the terms of a settlement but require time to draft and
If the parties are unable to draft and execute settlement documents prior to the week
of January 23, 2017, a further settlement conference may be necessary.
WHEREFORE, Microsoft and Defendants request that an order be entered continuing the
15
16 settlement conference, currently scheduled for January 6, 2017, until January 23, 2017 or later.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
Respectfully Submitted,
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: January 4, 2017
Dated: January 4, 2017
By:
By:
/s/ Audra M. Mori_______
Audra M. Mori (admitted pro hac vice)
Perkins Coie LLP
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90067
/s/ Eric J. Menhart_______
Eric J. Menhart
Lexero Law
316 F. Street, Suite 101
Washington, DC 20002
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendants Mark Pak, an
ORDER
Microsoft Corporation currently scheduled for January 6, 2017, is rescheduled for
individual; Julianna Pak, an individual;
The settlement conference
and Julianna Pak, an individual d/b/a
February 3, 2017 at 1:00 pm.
ibenevolo and ibenevolo.com
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: January 5, 2017
28
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
134053056.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?