Microsoft Corporation v. Pak et al

Filing 36

ORDER Granting 35 Stipulation Continuing Settlement Conference. ( Settlement Conference reset for 2/3/2017 01:00 PM before Judge Nancy J. Koppe.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/5/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00452-GMN-VCF Document 35 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 3 1 JOHN K. GALLAGHER, ESQ. (SBN. 0956) GUILD, GALLAGHER & FULLER, LTD. 2 100 West Liberty St., Suite 800 P.O. Box 2838 3 Reno, Nevada 89501 Telephone: 775.786.2366 4 Facsimile: 775.322.9105 jgallagher@ggfltd.com 5 AUDRA M. MORI, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) 6 PERKINS COIE LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700 7 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: 310.788.9900 8 Facsimile: 310.788.3399 AMori@perkinscoie.com 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICROSOFT CORPORATION 10 WHITNEY C. WILCHER, ESQ. (SBN. 7212) 11 THE WILCHER FIRM 8465 West Sahara Ave., Suite 111-236 12 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Telephone: 702.528.5201 13 Facsimile: 702.979.4121 wcwilcher@hotmail.com 14 ERIC J. MENHART, ESQ. (admitted pro hac vice) 15 LEXERO LAW 316 F Street, Suite 101 16 Washington, DC 20002 Telephone: 855.453.9376 17 Facsimile: 855.453.9376 Eric.Menhart@Lexero.com 18 Attorneys for Defendants JULIANNA PAK and MARK PAK 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 21 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ) Case No. 2:16-cv-00452-GMN-VCF 22 ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 23 ) ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT v. ) CONFERENCE 24 ) JULIANNA PAK, an individual d/b/a ) 25 IBENEVOLO and IBENEVOLO.COM; ) (First Request by Stipulation and JULIANNA PAK, an individual; and MARK ) Proposed Order to Continue Date of 26 PAK, an individual, ) Conference) ) 27 Defendants. ) ) 28 134053056.1 Case 2:16-cv-00452-GMN-VCF Document 35 Filed 01/04/17 Page 2 of 3 1 Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) by and through its undersigned counsel of 2 record, and Defendants Julianna Pak, an individual doing business as ibenevolo and 3 4 5 ibenevolo.com; Julianna Pak, an individual; and Mark Pak, an individual (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. 6 A settlement conference took place on October 19, 2016. A continued telephonic 7 settlement conference took place on December 5, 2016, and a further in-person settlement 8 conference is set to take place on January 6, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. 9 10 11 12 2. execute settlement documents. Therefore, the parties request that the settlement conference set for January 6, 2017, be continued for approximately two weeks, until the week of January 23, 2017. 3. 13 14 Today the parties agreed to the terms of a settlement but require time to draft and If the parties are unable to draft and execute settlement documents prior to the week of January 23, 2017, a further settlement conference may be necessary. WHEREFORE, Microsoft and Defendants request that an order be entered continuing the 15 16 settlement conference, currently scheduled for January 6, 2017, until January 23, 2017 or later. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO STIPULATED: Respectfully Submitted, Respectfully Submitted, Dated: January 4, 2017 Dated: January 4, 2017 By: By: /s/ Audra M. Mori_______ Audra M. Mori (admitted pro hac vice) Perkins Coie LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 /s/ Eric J. Menhart_______ Eric J. Menhart Lexero Law 316 F. Street, Suite 101 Washington, DC 20002 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants Mark Pak, an ORDER Microsoft Corporation currently scheduled for January 6, 2017, is rescheduled for individual; Julianna Pak, an individual; The settlement conference and Julianna Pak, an individual d/b/a February 3, 2017 at 1:00 pm. ibenevolo and ibenevolo.com 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: January 5, 2017 28 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 134053056.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?