Desert Palace, Inc. v. Michael
ORDER Denying without prejudice the parties' 106 Stipulation to Amend Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/8/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS
ANDREW P. MICHAEL,
Case No. 2:16-cv-00462-JAD-GWF
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation to Amend Discovery Plan and
Scheduling Order (ECF No. 106), filed on September 7, 2017.
Despite footnote one in the parties’ stipulation, the Court is unclear whether the parties wish
to extend the discovery deadlines and still litigate Defendant’s motion to stay. If the parties still wish
to litigate the motion to stay, the Court will rule on that motion and then, based on that ruling, the
Court will determine what, if any, extension of discovery is appropriate. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation to Amend Discovery Plan and
Scheduling Order (ECF No. 106) is denied, without prejudice.
DATED this 8th day of September, 2017.
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?