Krogstad v. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. et al
Filing
67
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Nationwide Biweekly Administration and Defendant BMO Harris Bank meet and confer and filed a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order no later than 3/14/2017. Plaintiff's 66 proposed discovery plan and scheduling order is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DEAN KORGSTAD,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
NATIONWIDE BIWEEKLY et al,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )
Case No. 2:16-cv-0465-APG-CWH
ORDER
Presently before the Court is third-party Plaintiff Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc.’s
11
proposed discovery plan and scheduling order (ECF No. 66), filed on February 27, 2017. Third-
12
party Defendant BMO Harris Bank, N.A. has not joined Plaintiff in filing a proposed discovery plan.
13
Under Local Rule 26-1, a plaintiff must initiate scheduling conference within 30 days of the
14
first defendant’s appearance, and the parties must then submit a stipulated discovery plan and
15
scheduling order within 14 days of the scheduling conference. Here, Defendant first appeared (ECF
16
No. 51) on January 12, 2017, and according to Plaintiff’s representations, Defendant has not agreed
17
to meet and confer to draft a discovery plan.
18
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Nationwide Biweekly Administration and
19
Defendant BMO Harris Bank meet and confer and filed a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling
20
order no later than March 14, 2017. Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan and scheduling order is
21
denied without prejudice.
22
DATED: February 28, 2017.
23
24
_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?