Krogstad v. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. et al

Filing 83

ORDER Granting 82 Stipulation Staying Proceedings and Granting Leave of the Court for Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
J. RANDALL JONES, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 001927 MADISON ZORNES-VELA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 013626 KEMP, JONES & COULTHARD, LLP 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Seventeenth Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel. (702) 385-6000 Email: jrj@kempjones.com [Additional counsel listed on signature page] Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA DEAN KROGSTAD, on behalf of himself and, all others similarly situated Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:16-cv-00465–APG-CWH v. NATIONWIDE BIWEEKLY ADMINISTRATION, INC. and LOAN PAYMENT ADMINISTRATION, LLC, STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS AND GRANTING LEAVE OF THE COURT FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Defendants. STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS AND GRANTING LEAVE OF THE COURT FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Pursuant to LR IA 6-2 and LR 7-1, Defendants Loan Payment Administration, LLC. and Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. (“Defendants”) and Plaintiff Dean Krogstad, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On November 22, 2016, Defendants commenced an action against BMO Harris, N.A. (“BMO”) by filing a third-party complaint (ECF No. 40). 2. On January 12, 2017, BMO filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Third-Party Complaint (ECF No. 51). 3. On April 13, 2017, this Court granted BMO’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Third-Party Complaint (ECF No. 76). 4. On May 10, 2017, Defendants filed a Notice of Appeal to this Court’s Order compelling arbitration and dismissing third-party complaint (ECF No. 77). 5. If the appeal were granted, it would best utilize the Court and the Parties’ time to simultaneously address the issues in this case; and thus, the Parties jointly request an Order administratively staying this case during the pendency of Defendant’s appeal to ECF No. 76. 6. The Parties further request that the Court extend Defendants’ response time to pending discovery to thirty (30) days from the date the Court lifts the stay. 7. The Parties agree that within thirty (30) days of the exhaustion of all appeals to ECF No. 76, the parties shall meet and confer and submit to the Court a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. 8. Finally, Defendants intend to substitute their counsel of record; both local and pro hac vice counsel; and thus, the Defendants request the Court grant leave to permit them the filing of a substitution of counsel. DATED this 30th day of June 2017. KEMP JONES & COULTHARD, LLP MUEHLBAUER LAW OFFICE, LTD. /s/ J. Randall Jones J. Randall Jones, Esq. (#1927) Madison P. Zornes-Vela (#13626) Wells Fargo Tower, 17th Floor 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel: (702) 385-6000 Fax: (702) 385-6001 Email: r.jones@kempjones.com Email: m.zornes-vela@kempjones.com /s/ Andrew R. Muehlbauer Andrew R. Muehlbauer (#10161) 7915 West Sahara Ave., Suite 104 Las Vegas, Nevada 78117 Tel: (702) 330-4505 Fax: (702) 825-0141 Email: andrew@mlolegal.com Attorney for Dean Krogstad, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated MARKOVITS, STOCK & DEMARCO, LLC /s/ W.B. Markovits W.B. Markovits Ohio Bar No.: 0018514 Christopher D. Stock Ohio Bar No.: 0075443 119 East Court Street, Suite 530 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Tel: (513) 651-3700 Fax: (513) 665-0219 bmarkovits@msdlegal.com cstock@msdlegal.com Attorneys for Defendants Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc., and Loan Payment Administration, LLC. IT IS ORDERED: ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE July 10, 2017 DATED: ___________________________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?